Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/024eb9206cc9b99a739c9b3bda290952b76a742bf25973b8a59ea3e3524af9c4.txt

37 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
Understanding and Managing Leverage 175
also fall to $2.50. If, instead, the value of the underlying security increases
by $2.50, the value of that allocation will rise to $7.50.
In a levered portfolio, each $5 allocation uses some proportion of
capital that is not yours—borrowed in the case of a margin loan and con-
tingently borrowed in the case of an option. This means that for every
$1 increase or decrease in the value of the underlying security, the lev-
ered allocation increases or decreases by more than $1. Leverage, in this
context, represents the rate at which the value of the allocation increases
or decreases for every one-unit change in the value of the underlying
security.
When thinking about the risk of leverage, we must treat different types
of losses differently. A realized loss represents a permanent loss of capital—a
sunk cost for which future returns can offset but never undo. An unrealized
loss may affect your psychology but not your wealth (unless you need to
realize the loss to generate cash flow for something else—I talk about this
in Chapter 11 when I address hedging). For this reason, when we measure
how much leverage we have when the underlying security declines, we will
measure it on the basis of how close we are to suffering a realized loss rather
than on the basis of the unrealized value of the loss. Leverage on the profit
side will be handled the same way: we will treat our fair value estimate as the
price at which we will realize a gain. Because the current market price of a
security may not sit exactly between our fair value estimate and the point at
which we suffer a realized loss, our upside and downside leverage may be
different.
Lets see how this comes together with an actual example. For this ex-
ample, I looked at the price of Intels (INTC) shares and options when the
former were trading at $22.99. Lets say that we want to commit 5 percent
of our portfolio value to an investment in Intel, which we believe is worth
$30 per share. For every $100,000 in our portfolio, this would mean buying
217 shares. This purchase would cost us $4,988.83 (neglecting taxes and
fees, of course) and would leave us with $11.17 of cash in reserve. After we
made the buy, the stock price would fluctuate, and depending on what its
price was at the end of 540 days [Im using as an investment horizon the
days to expiration of the longest-tenor long-term equity anticipation secu-
rities (LEAPS)], the allocations profit and loss profile would be represented
graphically like this: