Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/relevant/text/a0b33f143448c822f6e616435b43dbc09fa368e9b0e400cf1564356ce3259f58.txt

38 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
346 Part Ill: Put Option Strategies
The bullish portion of this combination of calendar spreads would be set up by sell­
ing the shorter-term January 70 call for 3 points and simultaneously buying the
longer-term April 70 call for 5 points. This portion of the spread requires a 2-point
debit. The bearish portion of the spread would be constructed using the puts. The
near-term January 60 put would be sold for 2 points, while the longer-term April 60
put would be bought for 3. Thus, the put portion of the spread is a I-point debit.
Overall, then, the combination of the calendar spreads requires a 3-point debit, plus
commissions. This debit is the required investment; no additional collateral is
required. Since there are four options involved, the commission cost will be large.
Again, establishing the spreads in quantity can reduce the percentage cost of com­
missions.
Note that all the options involved in this position are initially out-of-the-money.
The stock is below the striking price of the calls and is above the striking price of the
puts. One has sold a near-term put and call combination and purchased a longer-term
combination. For nomenclature purposes, this strategy is called a "calendar combi­
nation."
There are a variety of possible outcomes from this position. First, it should be
understood that the risk is limited to the amount of the initial debit, 3 points in this
example. If the underlying stock should rise dramatically or fall dramatically before
the near-term options expire, both the call spread and the put spread will shrink to
nearly nothing. This would be the least desirable result. In actual practice, the spread
would probably have a small positive differential left even after a premature move by
the underlying stock, so that the probability of a loss of the entire debit would be
small.
If the near-term options both expire worthless, a profit will generally exist at
that time.
Example: IfXYZ were still at 65 at January expiration in the prior example, the posi­
tion should be profitable at that time. The January call and put would expire worth­
less with XYZ at 65, and the April options might be worth a total of 5 points. The
spread could thus be closed for a profit with XYZ at 65 in January, since the April
options could be sold for 5 points and the initial "cost" of the spread was only 3 points.
Although commissions would substantially reduce this 2-point gross profit, there
would still be a good percentage profit on the overall position. If the strategist decides
to take his profit at this time, he would be operating in a conservative manner.
However, the strategist may want to be more aggressive and hold onto the April
combination in hopes that the stock might experience a substantial movement before
those options expire. Should this occur, the potential profits could be quite large.