Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/relevant/text/75cd19578d3f9d3dface60eea33c9d9762753412aad5d7817b79159b63bbb07a.txt

37 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
Chapter 40: Advanced Concepts 887
will necessarily be used to make these projections. As was shown earlier, if there is a
distortion in the current implied volatilities of the options involved in the position,
the strategist should use the current implieds as input to the model for future option
price projections. If he does not, the position may look overly attractive if expensive
options are being sold or cheap ones are being bought. A truer profit picture is
obtained by propagating the current implied volatility structure into the near future.
Using an example similar to the previous one a ratio spread using short stock
to make it delta neutral - the concepts will be described.
Initial Position. XYZ is at 60. The January 70 calls, which have three months
until expiration, are expensive with respect to the January 60 calls. A strategist
expects this discrepancy to disappear when the implied volatility of XYZ options
decreases. He therefore established the following position, which is both gamma
and delta neutral.
Position Delta Gamma
Long 100 January 60 calls 0.57 0.0723
Short 240 January 70 calls 0.20 0.0298
Short 800 XYZ
The risk measures for the entire position are:
Position delta: -38 shares (virtually delta neutral)
Position gamma: + 7 shares (gamma neutral)
Position theta: + $263
Position vega: -$827
Theta Vega
-0.020 0.109
-0.019 0.080
Thus, the position is both gamma and delta neutral. Moreover, it has the attrac­
tive feature of making $263 per day because of the positive theta. Finally, as was the
intention of the spreader, it will make money if the volatility of XYZ declines: $827
for each percentage point decrease in implied volatility. Two equations in two
unknowns (gamma and vega) were solved to obtain the quantities to buy and sell. The
resulting position delta was neutralized by selling 800 XYZ.
The following analyses will assume that the relative expensiveness of the April
70 calls persists. These are the calls that were sold in the position. If that overpricing
should disappear, the spread would look more favorable, but there is no guarantee
that they will cheapen - especially over a short time period such as one or two weeks.
How would the position look in 7 days at the stock prices determined above?