Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/relevant/text/4ded1f745cb81c539b9052179fcdaf5a2682fd4fe1ffc7015f4b8b522aae4426.txt

38 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
Chapter 36: The Basics ol Volatility Trading 737
It's important for anyone using implied volatility in his trading decisions to
understand that the range of past implied volatilities is important, and to realize that
the volatility range expands as time shrinks.
IS IMPLIED VOLATILITY A GOOD PREDICTOR OF ACTUAL VOLATILITY?
The fact that one can calculate implied volatility does not mean that the calculation
is a good estimate of forthcoming volatility. As stated above, the marketplace does not
really know how volatile an instrument is going to be, any more than it knows the
forthcoming price of the stock. There are clues, of course, and some general ways of
estimating forthcoming volatility, but the fact remains that sometimes options trade
with an implied volatility that is quite a bit out of line with past levels. Therefore,
implied volatility may be considered to be an inaccurate estimate of what is really
going to happen to the stock during the life of the option. Just remember that implied
volatility is a forward-looking estimate, and since it is based on traders' suppositions,
it can be wrong - just as any estimate of future events can be in error.
The question posed above is one that should probably be asked more often than
it is: "Is implied volatility a good predictor of actual volatility?" Somehow, it seems
logical to assume that implied and historical (actual) volatility will converge. That's
not really true, at least not in the short term. Moreover, even if they do converge,
which one was right to begin with - implied or historical? That is, did implied volatil­
ity move to get more in line with actual movements of the underlying, or did the
stock's movement speed up or slow down to get in line with implied volatility?
To illustrate this concept, a few charts will be used that show the comparison
between implied and historical volatility. Figure 36-4 shows information for the
$0EX Index. In general, $0EX options are overpriced. See the discussion in
Chapter 29. That is, implied volatility of $0EX options is almost always higher than
what actual volatility turns out to be. Consider Figure 36-4. There are three lines in
the figure: (a) implied volatility, (b) actual volatility, and (c) the difference between
the two. There is an important distinction here, though, as to what comprises these
curves:
(a) The implied volatility curve depicts the 20-day moving average of daily compos­
ite implied volatility readings for $0EX. That is, each day one number is com­
puted as a composite implied volatility for $0EX for that day. These implied
volatility figures are computed using the averaging formula shown in the chapter
on mathematical applications, whereby each option's implied volatility is weight­
ed by trading volume and by distance in- or out-of-the-money, to arrive at a sin­
gle composite implied volatility reading for the trading day. To smooth out those
daily readings, a 20-day simple moving average is used. This daily implied volatil-