Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/8a03581019454b22dbab0508abac914e19c07d45eb0f9f8bb8a663f3b76fb0a3.txt

23 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
Short-Strangle Example
Lets revisit John, a Federal XYZ (XYZ) trader. XYZ is at $104.75 in this
example, with an implied volatility of 26 percent and a stock volatility of
22. Both implied and realized volatility are higher than has been typical
during the past twelve months. John wants to sell volatility. In this example,
he believes the stock price will remain in a fairly tight range, causing
realized volatility to revert to its normal level, in this case between 15 and
20 percent.
He does everything possible to ensure success. This includes scanning the
news headlines on XYZ and its financials for a reason not to sell volatility.
Playing devils advocate with oneself can uncover unforeseen yet valid
reasons to avoid making bad trades. John also notes the recent price range,
which has been between $111.71 and $102.05 over the past month. Once
John commits to an outlook on the stock, he wants to set himself up for
maximum gain if hes right and, for that matter, to maximize his chances of
being right. In this case, he decides to sell a strangle to give himself as
much margin for error as possible. He sells 10 three-week 100110
strangles at 1.80.
Exhibit 15.11 compares the greeks of this strangle with those of the 105
straddle.
EXHIBIT 15.11 Short straddle vs. short strangle.
As expected, the strangles greeks are comparable to the straddles but of
less magnitude. If Johns intention were to capture a drop in IV, hed be