Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/673fbd9c9c36acb6cf54fd83e0cc479559322d72f84f012f61fff0fef3e52c6a.txt

39 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
Cl,opter 20: The Sale of a Straddle
XYZ January 45 put, l; and
XYZ January 50 call, 3.
311
The January 50 call price is included because it will be part of the follow-up strategy.
Notice that this straddle has a considerable amount of time value premium remain­
Ing in it, and thus would be rather expensive to buy back at the current time.
Suppose, however, that the straddle writer does not touch the January 45 straddle
tliat he is short, but instead buys the January 50 call for protection to the upside.
Since this call costs 3 points, he will now have a position with a total credit of 4 points.
(The straddle was originally sold for 7 points credit and he is now spending 3 points
for the call at 50.) This action of buying a call at a higher strike than the striking price
of the straddle has limited the potential loss to the upside, no matter how far the
stock might run up. If XYZ is anywhere above 50 at expiration, the put will expire
worthless and the writer will have to pay 5 points to close the call spread short
January 45, long January 50. This means that his maximum potential loss is 1 point
plus commissions if XYZ is anywhere above 50 at expiration.
In addition to being able to limit the upside loss, this type of follow-up action
still allows room for potential profits. If XYZ is anywhere between 41 and 49 at expi­
ration - that is, less than 4 points away from the striking price of 45 - the writer will
he able to buy the straddle back for less than 4 points, thereby making a profit.
Thus, the straddle writer has both limited his potential losses to the upside and
also allowed room for profit potential should the underlying stock fall back in price
toward the original striking price of 45. Only severe price reversal, with the stock
falling back below 40, would cause a large loss to be taken. In fact, by the time the
stock could reverse its current strong upward momentum and fall all the way back to
40, a significant amount of time should have passed, thereby allowing the writer to
purchase the straddle back with only a relatively small amount of time premium left
in it.
This follow-up strategy has an effect on the margin requirement of the position.
When the calls are bought as protection to the upside, the writer has, for margin
purposes, a bearish spread in the calls and an uncovered put. The margin for this
position would normally be less than that required for the straddle that is 5 points
in-the-money.
A secondary move is available in this strategy.
Example: The stock continues to climb over the short term and the out-of-the­
money put drops to a price of less than ½ point. The straddle writer might now
consider buying back the put, thereby leaving himself with a bear spread in the
calls. His net credit left in the position, after buying back the put at ½, would be