Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/31de947159f9c8e689b3b55d8bc8aec9153925fab9f2ee5216e2703a6cf7e3cb.txt

39 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
Chapter 41: Taxes 929
Example: An investor has written an uncovered XYZ January 50 call for 5 points and
the call has dropped in value to 1 point in early December. He might want to take
the 4-point gain, but would prefer to defer realization of the gain until the following
tax year. Since the call write is at a profit, the stock must have dropped and is prob­
ably selling around 45 in early December. Buying the underlying stock would not
accomplish his purpose, because if the stock continued to decline through year-end,
he could lose a substantial amount on the stock purchase and could make only 1 more
point on the call write. Similarly, a call purchase would not work well. A call with a
lower striking price - for example, the XYZ January 45 or the January 40- could lose
substantial value if the underlying stock continued to drop in price. An out-of-the­
money call - the XYZ January 60 - is also unacceptable, because if the underlying
stock rallied to the high 50's, the writer would lose money both on his January 50 call
write and on his January 60 call purchase at expiration. Writing a put option would
not "lock in" the profit either. If the underlying stock continued to decline, the loss­
es on the put write would certainly exceed the remaining profit potential of 1 point
in the January 50 call. Alternatively, if the stock rose, the losses on the January 50 call
could offset the limited profit potential provided by a put write. Thus, there is no rel­
atively safe way for an uncovered call writer to attempt to "lock in" an unrealized gain
for the purpose of deferring it to the following tax year. The put writer seeking to
defer his gains faces similar problems.
UNEQUAL TAX TREATMENT ON SPREADS
There are two types of spreads in which the long side may receive different tax treat­
ment than the short side. One is the normal equity option spread that is held for more
than one year. The other is any spread between futures, futures options, or cash­
based options and equity options.
With equity options, if one has a spread in place for more than one year and if
the movement of the underlying stock is favorable, one could conceivably have a
long-term gain on the long side and a short-term loss on the short side of the spread.
Example: An investor establishes an XYZ bullish call spread in options that have 15
months of life remaining: In October of one year, he buys the January 70 LEAPS call
expiring just over a year in the future. At the same time, he sells the January 80
LEAPS call, again expiring just over a year hence. Suppose he pays 13 for the January
70 call and receives 7 for the January 80 call. In December of the following year, he
decides to remove the spread, after he has held it for more than one year - specifi­
cally, for 14 months in this case. XYZ has advanced by that time, and the spread is
worth 9. With XYZ at 90, the January 70 call is trading at 20 and the January 80 call
is trading at 11. The capital gain and loss results for tax purposes are summarized in
the following table (commissions are omitted from this example):