Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/083b10d6a5c2cae50aed106f40b81e6027ebd144fe873a53e83345c83b61a640.txt

49 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
716 Part V: Index Options and Futures
position has become long by using the delta of the options in the strategy. He can
then use futures or other options in order to make the position more neutral, if he
wants to.
Example: Suppose that both unleaded gasoline and heating oil have rallied some and
that the futures spread has widened slightly. The following information is known:
Future or Option
January heating oil futures:
January unleaded gasoline futures:
January heating oil 60 call:
January unleaded gas 62 put:
Total profit:
Price
.7100
.6300
11.05
1.50
Net
Change
+ .055
+ .045
+ 4.65
- 2.75
Profit/loss
+$9,765
- 5,775
+$3,990
The futures spread has widened to 8 cents. If the strategist had established the
spread with futures, he would now have a one-cent ( $420) profit on five contracts, or
a $2,100 profit. The profit is larger in the option strategy.
The futures have rallied as well. Heating oil is up 5½ cents from its initial price,
while unleaded is up 4½ cents. This rally has been large enough to drive the puts out­
of-the-money. When one has established the intermarket spread with options, and
the futures rally this much, the profit is usually greater from the option spread. Such
is the case in this example, as the option spread is ahead by almost $4,000.
This example shows the most desirable situation for the strategist who has
implemented the option spread. The futures rally enough to force the puts out-of­
the-money, or alternatively fall far enough to force the calls to be out-of-the-money.
If this happens in advance of option expiration, one option will generally have almost
all of its time value premium disappear (the calls in the above example). The other
option, however, will still have some time value ( the puts in the example).
This represents an attractive situation. However, there is a potential negative,
and that is that the position is too long now. It is not really a spread anymore. If
futures should drop in price, the calls will lose value quickly. The puts will not gain
much, though, because they are out-of-the-money and will not adequately protect
the calls. At this juncture, the strategist has the choice of taking his profit - closing
the position - or making an adjustment to make the spread more neutral once again.
He could also do nothing, of course, but a strategist would normally want to protect
a profit to some extent.