Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/relevant/text/fde8351491d1f3476bac4ffab0e48b63a5e862c32c8ae66396bea1cbb577b074.txt

37 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
904 Part VI: Measuring and Trading Volatility
Recall that, in the same example used to describe gamma, the position was delta
long 686 shares and had a positive gamma of 328 shares. Furthermore, we now see
that the gamma itself is going to decrease as the stock moves up ( it is negative) or will
increase as the stock moves down. In fact, it is expected to increase or decrease by
22 shares for each point XYZ moves.
So, if XYZ moves up by 1 point, the following should happen:
a. Delta increases from 686 to 1,014, increasing by the amount of the gamma.
b. Gamma decreases from 328 to 306, indicating that a further upward move by
XYZ will result in a smaller increase in delta.
One can build a general picture of how the gamma of the gamma changes over
different situations - in- or out-of-the-money, or with more or less time remaining
until expiration. The following table of two index calls, the January 350 with one
month of life remaining and the December 350 with eleven months of life remain­
ing, shows the delta, gamma, and gamma of the gamma for various stock prices.
Index January 350 call December 350 call
Price Delta Gamma Gamma/Gamma Delta Gamma Gamma/Gamma
310 .0006 .0001 .0000 .3203 .0083 .0000
320 .0087 .0020 .0004 .3971 .0082 .0000
330 .0618 .0100 .0013 .4787 .0080 -.0000
340 .2333 .0744 .0013 .5626 .0078 -.0001
350 .5241 .0309 -.0003 .6360 .0073 -.0001
360 .7957 .0215 -.0014 .6984 .0067 -.0001
370 .9420 .0086 -.0010 .7653 .0060 -.0001
380 .9892 .0021 -.0003 .8213 .0052 -.0001
Several conclusions can be drawn, not all of which are obvious at first glance.
First of all, the gamma of the gamma for long-term options is very small. This should
be expected, since the delta of a long-term option changes very slowly. The next fact
can best be observed while looking at the shorter-term January 350 table. The
gamma of the gamma is near zero for deeply out-of-the-money options. But, as the
option comes closer to being in-the-money, the gamma of the gamma becomes a pos­
itive number, reaching its maximum while the option is still out-of-the-money. By the
time the option is at-the-money, the gamma of the gamma has turned negative. It
then remains negative, reaching its most negative point when slightly in-the-money.
From there on, as the option goes even deeper into-the-money, the gamma of the
gamma remains negative but gets closer and closer to zero, eventually reaching
(minus) zero when the option is very far in-the-money.