Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/relevant/text/014513abea8fb8ce985a9aad32f66ee496d00924faec244030445daaf39a9b4e.txt

39 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
Chapter 40: Advanced Concepts 849
Let us now take a look at how both volatility and time affect the delta of a call
option. Much of the data to be presented in this chapter will be in both tabular and
graphical form, since some readers prefer one style or the other.
The volatility of the underlying stock has an effect on delta. If the stock is not
volatile, then in-the-money options have a higher delta, and out-of-the-money
options have a lower delta. Figure 40-1 and Table 40-1 depict the deltas of various
calls on two stocks with differing volatilities. The deltas are shown for various strike
prices, with the time remaining to expiration equal to 3 months and the underlying
stock at a price of 50 in all cases. Note that the graph confirms the fact that a low­
volatility stock's in-the-money options have the higher delta. The opposite holds true
for out-of-the-money options: The high-volatility stock's options have the higher delta
in that case. Another way to view this data is that a higher-volatility stock's options will
always have more time value premium than the low-volatility stock's. In-the-money,
these options with more time value will not track the underlying stock price move­
ment as closely as ones with little or no time value. Thus, in-the-money, the low­
volatility stock's options have the higher delta, since they track the underlying stock
price movements more closely. Out-of-the-money, the entire price of the option is
composed of time value premium. The ones with higher time value (the ones on the
high-volatility stock) will move more since they have a higher price. Thus, out-of-the­
money, the higher-volatility stock's options have the greater delta.
Time also affects delta. Figures 40-2 (see Table 40-2) and 40-4 show the rela­
tionships between time and delta. Figure 40-2's scales are similar to those in Figure
40-2, delta vs. volatility: The deltas are shown for various striking prices, with XYZ
assumed to be equal to 50 in all cases. Notice that in-the-money, the shorter-term
options have the higher delta. Again, this is because they have the least time value
premium. Out-of-the-money, the opposite is true: The longer-term options have the
higher deltas, since these options have the most time value premium.
Figure 40-3 (see Table 40-3) depicts the delta for an XYZ January 50 call with
XYZ equal to 50. The horizontal axis in this graph is "weeks until expiration." Note
that the delta of a longer-term at-the-money option is larger than that of a shorter­
term option. In fact, the delta shrinks more rapidly as expiration draws nearer. Thus,
even if a stock remains unchanged and its volatility is constant, the delta of its options
will be altered as time passes. This is an important point to note for the strategist,
since he is constantly monitoring the risk characteristics of his position. He cannot
assume that his position is the same just because the stock has remained at the same
price for a period of time.
Position Delta. Another usage of the term delta is what has previously been
referred to as the equivalent stock position (ESP); for futures options, it would be