Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/16d44a653d9c27d10e463d6b71eea0255185cdb525ca01a3fef51a731e793fe4.txt

36 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
110 Part II: Call Option Strategies
worst of the four at expiration if XYZ remains near its current price, staying above 53
but not rising above 63 in this example.
The other alternative, the third one listed, is to continue to hold the October 50
call but to sell the October 60 call against it. This would create what is known as a bull
spread, and the tactic can be used only by traders who have a margin account and can
meet their firm's minimum equity requirement for spreading (generally $2,000). This
spread position has no risk, for the long side of the spread - the October 50 cost 3
points, and the short side of the spread - the October 60 - brought in 3 points via its
sale. Even if the underlying stock drops below 50 by expiration and all the calls expire
worthless, the trader cannot lose anything except commissions. On the other hand, the
maximum potential of this spread is 10 points, the difference between the striking
prices of 50 and 60. This maximum potential would be realized if XYZ were anywhere
above 60 at expiration, for at that time the October 50 call would be worth 10 points
more than the October 60 call, regardless of how far above 60 the underlying stock
had risen. This strategy will be the best peiformer of the four if XYZ remains relative­
ly unchanged, above the lower strike but not much above the higher strike by expira­
tion. It is interesting to note that this tactic is never the worst peiforrner of the four
tactics, no matter where the stock is at expiration. For example, if XYZ drops below
50, this strategy has no risk and is therefore better than the "do nothing" strategy. If
XYZ rises substantially, this spread produces a profit of 10 points, which is better than
the 6 points of profit offered by the "liquidate" strategy.
There is no definite answer as to which of the four tactics is the best one to
apply in a given situation. However, if a call can be sold against the currently long call
to produce a bull spread that has little or no risk, it may often be an attractive thing
to do. It can never tum out to be the worst decision, and it would produce the largest
profits if XYZ does not rise substantially or fall substantially from its current levels.
Tables 3-2 and 3-3 summarize the four alternative tactics, when a call holder has an
unrealized profit. The four tactics, again, are:
1. "Do nothing" - continue to hold the currently long call.
2. "Liquidate" - sell the long call to take profits and do not reinvest.
3. "Roll up" - sell the long call, pocket the original investment, and use the remain­
ing proceeds to purchase as many out-of-the-money calls as possible.
4. "Spread" - create a bull spread by selling the out-of-the-money call against the
currently profitable long call, preferably taking in at least the original cost of the
long call.