Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/relevant/text/7c8e00f745ae6a1a2f8dd8f04218cc6f47660c1d3f460960721cf02d4f35e5a5.txt

51 lines
1.8 KiB
Plaintext

Chapter 37: How Volatility Affects Popular Strategies
Stock Price:
Strike Price:
Time Remaining:
Implied Volatility:
Theoretical Call Value:
100
100
1 month
38.1%
4.64
759
So, if implied volatility increases from 20% to 26% over the first month, then
this call option would still be trading at the same price 4.64. That's not an unusual
increase in implied volatility; increases of that magnitude, 20% to 26%, happen all
the time. For it to then increase from 26% to 38% over the next month is probably
less likely, but it is certainly not out of the question. There have been many times in
the past when just such an increase has been possible - during any of the August,
September, or October bear markets or mini-crashes, for example. Also, such an
increase in implied volatility might occur if there were takeover rumors in this stock,
or if the entire market became more volatile, as was the case in the latter half of the
1990s.
Perhaps this example was distorted by the fact that an implied volatility of 20%
is a fairly low number to begin with. What would a similar example look like if one
started out with a much higher implied volatility say, 80%?
Example: Making the same assumptions as in the previous example, but now setting
the implied volatility to a much higher level of 80%, the Black-Scholes model now
says that the call would be worth a price of 16.45:
Stock Price:
Strike Price:
Time Remaining:
Implied Volatility:
Theoretical Call Value:
100
100
3 months
80%
16.45
Again, one must ask the question: "If a month passes, what implied volatility
would be necessary for the Black-Scholes model to yield a price of 16.45?" In this
case, it turns out to be an implied volatility of just over 99%.
Stock Price:
Strike Price:
Time Remaining:
Implied Volatility:
Theoretical Call Value:
100
100
2 months
99.4%
16.45