Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/relevant/text/60d5650d6dafb35c59e02ed976136ca0c11d3bb6191153bd1165cce2e007e7fe.txt

34 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
348 Part Ill: Put Option Strategies
In summary, this is a reasonable strategy if one operates it over a period of time
long enough to encompass several market cycles. The strategist must be careful not
to place a large portion of his trading capital in the strategy, however, since even
though the losses are limited, they still represent his entire net investment. A varia­
tion of this strategy, whereby one sells more options than he buys, is described in the
next chapter.
THE CALENDAR STRADDLE
Another strategy that combines calendar spreads on both put and call options can be
constructed by selling a near-term straddle and simultaneously purchasing a longer­
term straddle. Since the time value premium of the near-term straddle will decrease
more rapidly than that of the longer-term straddle, one could make profits on a lim­
ited investment. This strategy is somewhat inferior to the one described in the pre­
vious section, but it is interesting enough to examine.
Example: Suppose that three months before January expiration, the following prices
exist:
XYZ common: 40
January 40 straddle: 5 April 40 straddle: 7
A calendar spread of the straddles could be established by selling the January 40
straddle and simultaneously buying the April 40 straddle. This would involve a cost
of 2 points, or the debit of the transaction, plus commissions.
The risk is limited to the amount of this debit up until {he time the near-term
straddle expires. That is, even if XYZ moves up in price by a substantial amount or
declines in price by a substantial amount, the worst that can happen is that the dif­
ference between the straddle prices shrinks to zero. This could cause one to lose an
amount equal to his original debit, plus commissions. This limit on the risk applies
only until the near-term options expire. If the strategist decides to buy back the near­
term straddle and continue to hold the longer-term one, his risk then increases by the
cost of buying back the near-term straddle.
Example: XYZ is at 43 when the January options expire. The January 40 call can now
be bought back for 3 points. The put expires worthless; so the whole straddle was
closed out for 3 points. The April 40 straddle might be selling for 6 points at that
time. If the strategist wants to hold on to the April straddle, in hopes that the stock
might experience a large price swing, he is free to do so after buying back the January