Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/relevant/text/5d8d3fa0d3d37e44755be474153b62bd1c33415ffdf0a21353a8e3080ccc3fe1.txt

33 lines
2.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
748 Part VI: Measuring and Trading Volatility
Sellers of volatility, however, have to be a lot more careful. One mistake could
be the last one. Selling naked calls that seem terrifically expensive by historic stan­
dards could be ruinous if a takeover bid subsequently emerges at a large premium to
the stock's current price. Even put sellers must be careful, although a lot of traders
think that selling naked puts is safe because it's the same as buying stock. But who
ever said buying stock wasn't risky? If the stock literally collapses - falling from 80,
say, to 15 or 20, as Oxford Health did, or from 30 to 2 as Sunrise Technology did -
then a put seller will be buried. Since the risk of loss from naked option selling is
large, one could be wiped out by a huge gap opening. That's why it's imperative to
study why the options are expensive before one sells them. If it's known, for exam­
ple, that a small biotech company is awaiting FDA trial results in two weeks,~and all
the options suddenly become expensive, the volatility seller should not attempt to be
a hero. It's obvious that at least some traders believe that there is a chance for the
stock to gap in price dramatically. It would be better to find some other situation in
which to sell options.
The seller of futures options or index options should be cautious too, although
there can't be takeovers in those markets, nor can there be a huge earnings surprise
or other corporate event that causes a big gap. The futures markets, though do have
things like crop reports and government economic data to deal with, and those can
create volatile situations, too. The bottom line is that volatility selling - even hedged
volatility selling - can be taxing and aggravating if one has sold volatility in front of
what turns out to be a news item that justifies the expensive volatility.
SUMMARY
Volatility trading is a predictable way to approach the market, because volatility
almost invariably trades in a range and therefore its value can be estimated with a
great deal more precision than can the actual prices of the underlyings. Even so, one
must be careful in his approach to volatility trading, because diligent research is
needed to determine if, in fact, volatility is "cheap" or "expensive." As with any sys­
tematic approach to the market, if one is sloppy about his research, he cannot expect
to achieve superior results. In the next few chapters, a good deal of time will be spent
to give the reader a good understanding of how volatility affects positions and how it
can be used to construct trades with positive expected rates of return.