Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/ffc968e9e0b54df317161cc1283fd98834d1f4ad49af1d1891e9bb49ac913f26.txt

36 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
Orapter 4: Other Call Buying Strategies 123
THE REVERSE HEDGE (SIMULATED STRADDLE)
There is another strategy involving the purchase of long calls against the short sale of
stock. In this strategy, one purchases calls on more shares than he has sold short. The
strategist can profit if the underlying stock rises far enough or falls far enough dur­
ing the life of the calls. This strategy is generally referred to as a reverse hedge or sim­
ulated straddle. On stocks for which listed puts are traded, this strategy is outmoded;
the same results can be better achieved by buying a straddle (a call and a put).
Hence, the name "simulated straddle" is applied to the reverse hedge strategy.
This strategy has limited loss potential, usually amounting to a moderate per­
centage of the initial investment, and theoretically unlimited profit potential. When
properly selected (selection criteria are described in great detail in Chapter 36,
which deals with volatility trading), the percentage of success can be quite high in
straddle or synthetic straddle buying. These features make this an attractive strategy,
especially when call premiums are low in comparison to the volatility of underlying
stock.
Example: XYZ is at 40 and an investor believes that the stock has the potential to
move by a relatively large distance, but he is not sure of the direction the stock will
take. This investor could short XYZ at 40 and buy 2 XYZ July 40 calls at 3 each to set
up a reverse hedge. If XYZ moves up by a large distance, he will incur a loss on his
short stock, but the fact that he owns two calls means that the call profits will outdis­
tance the stock loss. If, on the other hand, XYZ drops far enough, the short sale prof­
it will be larger than the loss on the calls, which is limited to 6 points. Table 4-2 and
Figure 4-2 show the possible outcomes for various stock prices at July expiration. If
XYZ falls, the stock profits on the short sale will accumulate, but the loss on the two
calls is limited to $600 (3 points each) so that, below 34, the reverse hedge can make
ever-increasing profits. To the upside, even though the short sale is incurring losses,
the call profits grow faster because there are two long calls. For example, at 60 at
expiration, there will be a 20-point ($2,000) loss on the short stock, but each XYZ July
40 call will be worth 20 points with the stock at 60. Thus, the two calls are worth
$4,000, representing a profit of $3,400 over the initial cost of $600 for the calls.
Table 4-2 and Figure 4-2 illustrate another important point: The maximum loss
would occur if the stock were exactly at the striking price at expiration of the calls. This
maximum loss would occur if XYZ were at 40 at expiration and would amount to $600.
In actual practice, since the short seller must pay out any dividends paid by the under­
lying stock, the risk in this strategy is increased by the amount of such dividends.