Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/760aca02a744d77cca4e2830d99832f6aada903a1ef29cbd2be6aa1a652c439c.txt

37 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
20: The Sale of a Straddle 309
gh it is 7 points in-the-money. This is not unusual in a bullish situation.
ver, the put might be worth 1 ½points.This is also not unusual, as out-of-the­
y puts with a large amount of time remaining tend to hold time value premium
well. Thus, the straddle writer would have to pay 10½ points to buy back this
dle, even though it is at the break-even point, 7 points in-the-money on the call
This example is included merely to demonstrate that it is a misconception to
ieve that one can always buy the straddle back at the break-even point and hold
losses to mere fractions of a point by doing so. This type of buy-back strategy
ks best when there is little time remaining in the straddle. In that case, the
options will indeed be close to parity and the straddle will be able to be bought back
for close to its initial value when the stock reaches the break-even point.
Another follow-up strategy that can be employed, similar to the previous one
but with certain improvements, is to buy back only the in-the-money option when it
reaches a price equal to that of the initial straddle price.
~mple: Again using the same situation, suppose that when XYZ began to climb
heavily, the call was worth 7 points when the stock reached 50. The in-the-money
option the call - is now worth an amount equal to the initial straddle value. It could
then be bought back, leaving the out-of-the-money put naked. As long as the stock
then remained above 45, the put would expire worthless. In practice, the put could
be bought back for a small fraction after enough time had passed or if the underly­
Ing stock continued to climb in price.
This type of follow-up action does not depend on taking action at a fixed stock
price, but rather is triggered by the option price itself. It is therefore a dynamic sort
of follow-up action, one in which the same action could be applied at various stock
prices, depending on the amount of time remaining until expiration. One of the prob­
lems with closing the straddle at the break-even points is that the break-even point is
C)nly a valid break-even point at expiration. A long time before expiration, this stock
price will not represent much of a break-even point, as was pointed out in the last
example. Thus, buying back only the in-the-money option at a fixed price may often
be a superior strategy. The drawback is that one does not release much collateral by
buying back the in-the-money option, and he is therefore stuck in a position with
little potential profit for what could amount to a considerable length of time. The
collateral released amounts to the in-the-money amount; the writer still needs to
C.'Ollateralize 20% of the stock price.
One could adjust this follow-up method to attempt to retain some profit. For
example, he might decide to buy the in-the-money option when it has reached a