Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/63db0a14ccb6fc2c445295ac861a37d27cda431d4ea6a4003a393bc29bd312ff.txt

46 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
519
OPTION TrAdINg STrATegIeS
Comment. This strategy provides an interesting alternative method of pyramiding—that is, increas-
ing the size of a winning position. For example, a trader who is already long a futures contract at a
profit and believes the market is heading higher may wish to increase his position without doubling
his risk in the event of a price reaction—as would be the case if he bought a second futures contract.
Such a speculator could choose instead to supplement his long position with the purchase of a call,
thereby limiting the magnitude of his loss in the event of a price retracement, in exchange for real-
izing a moderately lower profit if prices continued to rise.
Figure 35.9 compares the alternative strategies of buying two futures versus buying a futures con-
tract and a call. (For simplicity of exposition, the diagram assumes that both the futures contract and
the call are purchased at the same time.) As can be seen, the long two futures position will always do
moderately better in a rising market (by an amount equal to the premium paid for the call), but will
lose more in the event of a significant price decline. The difference in losses between the two strate-
gies will widen as larger price declines are considered.
Strategy 10: bearish “texas Option hedge” (Short Futures +
Long put)
example. Sell August gold futures at $1,200 and simultaneously buy an August $1,200 gold put at a
premium of $38.70/oz ($3,870). (See Table 35.10 and Figure 35.10.)
Comment. This strategy is perhaps most useful as an alternative means of increasing a short position.
As illustrated in Figure 35.10, the combination of a short futures contract and a long put will gain
moderately less than 2 short futures contracts in a declining market, but will lose a more limited
amount in a rising market.
tabLe 35.10 profit/Loss Calculations: bearish “texas Option hedge” (Short Futures + Long put)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Futures price at
expiration ($/oz)
premium of august $1200
put at Initiation ($/oz)
$ amount of
premium paid
profit/Loss on Short
Futures position
put Value at
expiration
profit/Loss on position
[(4) + (5) (3)]
1,000 38.7 $3,870 $20,000 $20,000 $36,130
1,050 38.7 $3,870 $15,000 $15,000 $26,130
1,100 38.7 $3,870 $10,000 $10,000 $16,130
1,150 38.7 $3,870 $5,000 $5,000 $6,130
1,200 38.7 $3,870 $0 $0 $3,870
1,250 38.7 $3,870 $5,000 $0 $8,870
1,300 38.7 $3,870 $10,000 $0 $13,870
1,350 38.7 $3,870 $15,000 $0 $18,870
1,400 38.7 $3,870 $20,000 $0 $23,870