Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/583df130bea55b61de038d6fe9717810abe9cbdc710baa5853f8709567074b51.txt

29 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
822 Part VI: Measuring and Trading Volatility
Consider the historical volatilities of one of the wilder stocks of the tech stock
boom, Rambus (RMBS). Historical volatilities had ranged between 50% and ll0%,
from the listing of RMBS stock, through February 2000. At that time, the stock aver­
aged a price of about $20 per share.
Things changed mightily when RMBS stock began to rise at a tremendous rate
in February 2000. At that time, the stock blasted to ll5, pulled back to 35, made a
new high near 135, and then collapsed to a price near 20. Hence, the stock itself had
completed a wild round-trip over the two-year period. See Figures 39-2 and 39-3 for
the stock chart and the historical volatility chart of RMBS over the time period in
question.
As this happened, historical volatility skyrocketed. After February 2000, and
well into 2001, historical volatility was well above 120%. Thus it is clear that the
behavior patterns of Rambus changed greatly after February 2000. However, if one
had been comparing historical volatilities at any time after that, he would have erro­
neously concluded that RMBS was about to slow down, that the historic volatilities
were too high in comparison with where they'd been in the past. If this had led one
to sell volatility on RMBS, it could have been a very expensive mistake.
While RMBS may be an extreme example, it is certainly not alone. Many other
stocks experienced similar changes in behavior. In this author's opinion, such behav­
ior debunks the usefulness of comparing historical volatility with past measures of
historical volatility as a valid way of selecting volatility trades.
FIGURE 39-2.
Historical volatilities of RMBS.
RMBS 19.000 17.250 18.875 20010410
............ ······· 60.0
· ·················· 50.0
...... ······· 40. 0
39 M i·h··-:; s ·~ s a ~--f:i--·5--r;;····~··h s·s- A s a N □ s--r·;; r