Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/454cedd2b7b6b4ffec87049ea7cbedc22485b9a4c219b723be09970ec8a7e505.txt

38 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
Chapter 40: Advanced Concepts
Using deltas, the following spread appears to be neutral:
Buy l January bean 57 5 call at 19 .50
Sell 6 January bean 675 calls at 2.25
Net position:
19.50 DB
13.50 CR
6 Debit
879
At the time the original example was presented, it was demonstrated through
the use of the profit picture that the ratio was too steep and problems could result in
a large rally.
Now that one has the concept of gamma at his disposal, he can quantify what
those problems are.
The position gamma of this spread is quite negative:
Position gamma = .01 - 6 x .0026 = -0.0056
That is, for every 10 points that January soybeans rally, the position will become
short about 1/2 of one futures contract. The maximum profit point, 675, is 92 points
above the current price of 583. While beans would not normally rally 92 points in
only a few days, it does demonstrate that this position could become very short if
beans quickly rallied to the point of maximum profit potential. Rest assured there
would be no profit if that happened.
Even a small rally of 20 cents (points) in soybeans - less than the daily limit -
would begin to make this tiny spread noticeably short. If one had established the
spread in some quantity, say buying 100 and selling 600, he could become seriously
short very fast.
A neutral spreader would not use such a large ratio in this spread. Rather, he
would neutralize the gamma and then attempt to deal with the resulting delta. The
next section deals with ways to accomplish that.
CREATING MULTIFACETED NEUTRALITY
So what is the strategist to do? He can attempt to construct positions that are neutral
with respect to the other factors if he perceives them as a risk. There is no reason why
a position cannot be constructed as veg a neutral rather than delta neutral, if he wants
to eliminate the risk of volatility increases or decreases. Or, maybe he wants to elim­
inate the risk of stock price movements, in which case he would attempt to be gamma
neutral as well as delta neutral.
This seems like a simple concept until one first attempts to establish a position
that is neutral with respect to more than one risk variable. For example, if one is