Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/relevant/text/aa09f371d69a771efff3e29f0c3afa8f30ccd832cc28bff7c55ad38f08dc0a4d.txt

35 lines
2.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
G,pter 17: Put Buying in Conjunction with Common Stock Ownership
TAX CONSIDERATIONS
275
Although tax considerations are covered in detail in a later chapter, an important tax
law concerning the purchase of puts against a common stock holding should be men­
tioned at this time. If the stock owner is already a long-term holder of the stock at the
time that he buys the put, the put purchase has no effect on his tax status. Similarly,
if the stock buyer buys the stock at the time that he buys the put and identifies the
position as a hedge, there is no effect on the tax status of his stock. However, if one
Is currently a short-tenn holder of the common stock at the time that he buys a put,
he eliminates any accrued holding period on his common stock. Moreover, the hold­
ing period for that stock does not begin again until the put is sold.
Example: Assume the long-term holding period is 6 months. That is, a stock owner
must own the stock for 6 months before it can be considered a long-term capital gain.
An investor who bought the stock and held it for 5 months and then purchased a put
would wipe out his entire holding period of 5 months. Suppose he then held the put
and the stock simultaneously for 6 months, liquidating the put at the end of 6 months.
His holding period would start all over again for that common stock. Even though he
has owned the stock for 11 months - 5 months prior to the put purchase and 6
months more while he simultaneously owned the put - his holding period for tax pur­
poses is considered to be zero!
This law could have important tax ramifications, and one should consult a tax advisor
if he is in doubt as to the effect that a put purchase might have on the taxability of
his common stock holdings.
PUT BUYING AS PROTECTION FOR THE COVERED CALL WRITER
Since put purchases afford protection to the owner of common stock, some investors
naturally feel that the same protective feature could be used to limit their downside
risk in the covered call writing strategy. Recall that the covered call writing strategy
involves the purchase of stock and the sale of a call option against that stock. The cov­
ered write has limited upside profit potential and offers protection to the downside in
the amount of the call premium. The covered writer will make money if the stock falls
a little, remains unchanged, or rises by expiration. The covered writer can actually lose
money only if the stock falls by more than the call premium received. He has poten­
tially large downside losses. This strategy is known as a protective collar or, more sim­
ply, a "collar." (It is also called a "hedge wrapper," although that is an outdated term.)