Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/relevant/text/799d9f5af5827b09be75b15173832dba369f152dfb7ee544ce10dcf9dc5e5779.txt

37 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
40 Part II: Call Option Strategies
THE BENEFITS OF AN INCREASE IN STOCK PRICE
If XYZ increases in price moderately, the trader may be able to have the best of both
worlds.
Example: If XYZ is at or just below 50 at July expiration, the call still expires worth­
less, and the investor makes the $300 from the option in addition to having a small
profit from his stock purchase. Again, he still owns the stock.
Should XYZ increase in price by expiration to levels above 50, the covered
writer has a choice of alternatives. As one alternative, he could do nothing, in which
case the option would be assigned and his stock would be called away at the striking
price of 50. In that case, his profits would be equal to the $300 received from selling
the call plus the profit on the increase of his stock from the purchase price of 48 to
the sale price of 50. In this case, however, he would no longer own the stock. If as
another alternative he desires to retain his stock ownership, he can elect to buy back
( or cover) the written call in the open market. This decision might involve taking a
loss on the option part of the covered writing transaction, but he would have a cor­
respondingly larger profit, albeit unrealized, from his stock purchase. Using some
specific numbers, one can see how this second alternative works out.
Example: XYZ rises to a price of 60 by July expiration. The call option then sells near
its intrinsic value of 10. If the investor covers the call at 10, he loses $700 on the
option portion of his covered write. (Recall that he originally received $300 from the
sale of the option, and now he is buying it back for $1,000.) However, he relieves the
obligation to sell his stock at 50 ( the striking price) by buying back the call, so he has
an unrealized gain of 12 points in the stock, which was purchased at 48. His total
profit, including both realized and unrealized gains, is $500.
This profit is exactly the same as he would have made if he had let his stock be
called from him. If called, he would keep the $300 from the sale of the call, and he
would make 2 points ( $200) from buying the stock at 48 and selling it, via exercise, at
50. This profit, again, is a total of $500. The major difference between the two cases
is that the investor no longer owns his stock after letting it be called away, whereas
he retains stock ownership if he buys back the written call. Which of the two alter­
natives is the better one in a given situation is not always clear.
No matter how high the stock climbs in price, the profit from a covered write is
limited because the writer has obligated himself to sell stock at the striking price. The
covered writer still profits when the stock climbs, but possibly not by as much as he
might have had he not written the call. On the other hand, he is receiving $300 of
immediate cash inflow, because the writer may take the premium immediately and