Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/f96761fcad3859c11dbe37e64dcfb63da487582a106d83954c85e7a0310078a0.txt

38 lines
2.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
Chapter 40: Advanced Concepts 869
in price by 0.55; so seven of them will increase by 7 x 0.55, or 3.85 points total.
Similarly, the January 55 will increase in price by 0.35, so eleven of them would
increase in price by 11 x 0.35, or 3.85 points total. Hence, the long side of the spread
would profit by 3.85 points, while the short side loses 3.85 points - a neutral situation.
The resulting position is a ratio spread. The profitability of the spread occurs
between about 51 and 62 at expiration as shown in Figure 40-8, but that is not the
major point. The real attractiveness of the spread to the neutral trader is that if the
underpriced nature of the January 50 call (vis-a-vis the January 55 call) should dis­
appear, the spread should produce a profit, regardless of the short-term market
movement of XYZ. The spread could then be closed if this should occur.
To illustrate this fact, suppose that XYZ actually falls to 49, but the January 50
call returns to "fair value":
XYZ: 49
"Theoretical
Option Price Delta Value"
January 50 call 3.00 0.52 3.00
January 55 call 1.10 0.34 1.13
February 50 put 3.90 -0.42 3.84
Notice that the theoretical values in this table are equal to the theoretical val­
ues from the previous table, less the amount of the delta. Since the XYZ January 50
call is no longer underpriced, the position would be removed, and the strategist
would make nothing on his January 50's, but would make .40 on each of the eleven
short January 55's, for a profit of $440 less commissions.
This example leans heavily on the assumption that one is able to accurately esti­
mate the theoretical value and delta of the options. In real life, this chore can be
quite difficult, since the estimate requires one to define the future volatility of the
common stock. This is not easy. However, for the purposes of a spread, the ratio of
the two deltas is used. Moreover, the example didn't require that one know the exact
theoretical value of each option; rather, the only knowledge that was required was
that one of the options was cheap with respect to the other options.
As an alternative to a ratio spread, another type of delta neutral position could
be established from the previous data: Buy the January 50 call (this is the basis of the
position since it is supposedly the cheap option) and buy the February 50 put - the
only other choice from the data given. This position is a long straddle of sorts. Recall
that the delta of a put is negative; so again, the delta neutral ratio can be calculated
by dividing the absolute value of two deltas:
Delta neutral straddle ratio= 0.55/1-0.401 = 11-to-8