Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/f4addaa5fd11e6d0f00823169a31ce73c7c2dd2a9e58db360de4ebcdf6388353.txt

39 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
Chapter 40: Advanced Concepts
FIGURE 40-7.
Theta comparison, with XYZ = 50, t = three months.
-16
Very High Volatility
-14
-12
0 0
T""
X
~
-10
.i:::
I-
-8 Low Volatility
-6
0
40 45 50 55 60
Strike Price
TABLE 40-7.
863
65
Theta comparison for differing volatilities (XYZ = 50, t = 3 months).
Strike low Volatility Medium Volatility High Volatility
40 -0.005 -0.008 -0.013
45 -0.007 -0.010 -0.014
50 -0.008 -0.010 -0.015
55 -0.007 -0.010 -0.016
60 -0.006 -0.009 -0.016
65 -0.004 -0.008 -0.015
to lose value. This does not change the fact that, for very short-term options, the theta
is largest at-the-money.
Normally, the theta of an individual option is of little interest to the strategist.
He generally would be more concerned with delta or gamma. However, as with the
other risk measures, theta can be computed for an entire portfolio of options. This
measure, the "position theta," can be quite important because it gives the strategist
a good idea of how much gain or loss he can expect on a daily basis, due to time ero­
sion. The following example demonstrates this point. Note that the underlying secu­
rity itself has a theta of zero, since it cannot lose any value due to time decay.