Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/ecec40f9595a679a11bacb349ec1c04839c41c68e35655fbee87bd1252803958.txt

35 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
604 Part V: Index Options and Futures
Or, thinking in the alternative, if the index triples, then the structured product
(before adjustment factor) would be triple its initial price, or 30. Then 30 x 91.25%
= 27.375.
This example begins to demonstrate just how onerous the adjustment factor is.
Notice that if the underlying doubles, you don't make "double" less 8.75% (the
adjustment factor). No, you make "double" times the adjustment factor - 17.5% -
less than double. In the case of tripling, you make 3 x 8.75%, or 26.25%, less than
triple (i.e., the structured product is worth 27.375, not 30, so the percentage increase
was 173. 75%, not 200% - a difference of 26.25%, stated in terms of the initial invest­
ment). How can that be? It is a result of the adjustment factor being applied to the
$SPX price before your profit (cash settlement value) is computed.
THE BREAK-EVEN FINAL INDEX VALUE
Before discussing the adjustment factor in more detail, one more point should be
made: The owner of the structured product doesn't get back anything more than the
base value unless the underlying has increased by at least a fixed amount at maturi­
ty. In others words, the underlying must appreciate to a price large enough that the
final price times the adjustment factor is greater than the striking price of the struc­
tured product. We'll call this price the break-even final index value.
An example will demonstrate this concept.
Example: As in the preceding example, suppose that the striking price of the struc­
tured product is 1,100 and the adjustment factor is 8.75%. At what price would the
final cash settlement value be something greater than the base value of 10? That
price can be solved for with the following simple equation:
Break-even final index value = Striking price/ (1- Adjustment factor)
= 1,100 / (0.9125) = 1,205.48.
Generally speaking, the underlying index must increase in value by a specific
amount just to break even. In this case that amount is:
1 / (1 - Adjustment factor) = 1 / 0.9175 = 1.0959
In other words, the underlying index must increase in value by more than 9.5%
by maturity just to overcome the weight of the adjustment factor. If the index increas­
es by a lesser amount, then the structured product holder will merely receive back
his base value (10) at maturity.
The previous examples all show that the adjustment factor is not a trivial thing.
At first glance, one might not realize just how burdensome it is. After all, one might