Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/d703af3076f73c51affc962dbfd3a0b6c38744faa5b413515301dda323e8c644.txt

37 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
74 Part II: Call Option Strategies
with enough premium to realize any profit if the stock were then called away at expi­
ration. These situations arise more commonly on lower-priced stocks, where the
striking prices are relatively far apart in percentage terms. Out-of-the-money writes
are more susceptible to this problem than are in-the-money writes. Although it is not
emotionally satisfying to be in an investment position that cannot produce a profit -
at least for a limited period of time - it may still be beneficial to roll down to protect
as much of the stock price decline as possible.
Example: For the covered write described as "buy XYZ at 20, sell the January 20 call
at 2," the stock unexpectedly drops very quickly to 16, and the following prices exist:
XYZ common, 16;
XYZ January 20 call,½; and
XYZ January 15 call, 2½.
The covered writer is faced with a difficult choice. He currently has an unrealized
loss of 2½ points - a 4-point losson the stock which is partially offset by a 1 ½-point
gain on the January 20 call. This represents a fairly substantial percentage loss on his
investment in a short period of time. He could do nothing, hoping for the stock to
recover its loss. Unfortunately, this may prove to be wishful thinking.
If he considers rolling down, he will not be excited by what he sees. Suppose
that the writer wants to roll down from the January 20 to the January 15. He would
thus buy the January 20 at ½ and sell the January 15 at 2½, for a net credit of 2
points. By rolling down, he is obligating himself to sell his stock at 15, the striking
price of the January 15 call. Suppose XYZ were above 15 in January and were called
away. How would the writer do? He would lose 5 points on his stock, since he origi­
nally bought it at 20 and is selling it at 15. This 5-point loss is substantially offset by
his option profits, which amount to 4 points: 1 ½ points of profit on the January 20,
sold at 2 and bought back at ½, plus the 2½ points received from the sale of the
January 15. However, his net result is a 1-point loss, since he lost 5 points on the stock
and made only 4 points on the options. Moreover, this 1-point loss is the best that he
can hope for! This is true because, as has been demonstrated several times, a covered
writing position makes its maximum profit anywhere above the striking price. Thus,
by rolling down to the 15 strike, he has limited the position severely, to the extent of
"locking in a loss."
Even considering what has been shown about this loss, it is still correct for this
writer to roll down to the January 15. Once the stock has fallen to 16, there is noth­
ing anybody can do about the unrealized losses. However, if the writer rolls down, he
can prevent the losses from accumulating at a faster rate. In fact, he will do better by