35 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
35 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
604 Part V: Index Options and Futures
|
||
Or, thinking in the alternative, if the index triples, then the structured produc1
|
||
(before adjustment factor) would be triple its initial price, or 30. Then 30 x 91.25o/c
|
||
== 27.375.
|
||
This example begins to demonstrate just how onerous the adjustment factor is.
|
||
Notice that if the underlying doubles, you don't make "double" less 8.75% (the
|
||
adjustment factor). No, you make "double" times the adjustment factor - 17.5% -
|
||
less than double. In the case of tripling, you make 3 x 8.75%, or 26.25%, less than
|
||
triple (i.e., the structured product is worth 27.375, not 30, so the percentage increase
|
||
was 173. 75%, not 200% - a difference of 26.25%, stated in terms of the initial invest
|
||
ment). How can that be? It is a result of the adjustment factor being applied to the
|
||
$SPX price before your profit (cash settlement value) is computed.
|
||
THE BREAK-EVEN FINAL INDEX VALUE
|
||
Before discussing the adjustment factor in more detail, one more point should be
|
||
made: The owner of the structured product doesn't get back anything more than the
|
||
base value unless the underlying has increased by at least a fixed amount at maturi
|
||
ty. In others words, the underlying must appreciate to a price large enough that the
|
||
final price times the adjustment factor is greater than the striking price of the struc
|
||
tured product. We'll call this price the break-even final index value.
|
||
An example will demonstrate this concept.
|
||
Example: As in the preceding example, suppose tl1at the striking price of the struc
|
||
tured product is 1,100 and the adjustment factor is 8.75%. At what price would the
|
||
final cash settlement value be something greater than the base value of 10? That
|
||
price can be solved for with the following simple equation:
|
||
Break-even final index value== Striking price/ (1- Adjustment factor)
|
||
= 1,100 / (0.9125) == 1,205.48.
|
||
Generally speaking, the underlying index must increase in value by a specific
|
||
amount just to break even. In this case that amount is:
|
||
1 / (1 -Adjustment factor) = 1 / 0.9175 = 1.0959
|
||
In other words, the underlying index must increase in value by more than 9.5%
|
||
by maturity just to overcome the weight of the adjustment factor. If the index increas
|
||
es by a lesser amount, then the structured product holder will merely receive back
|
||
his base value ( 10) at maturity.
|
||
The previous examples all show that the adjustment factor is not a trivial thing.
|
||
At first glance, one might not realize just how burdensome it is. After all, one might |