Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/cdaf645a2d03db73df0bef9af006d4847516c49e3eedaea4348f2db4e0c5194f.txt

38 lines
2.7 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
S34 Part V: Index Options and Futures
points would be the fair premium if the index were at 320 and all the other variables
remained the same. Conversely, as the index falls, the fair value of the premium
shrinks.
The premium rises and falls in direct correlation with the carrying rate as well
as with time remaining until expiration. Note that this statement is true for stock
options also, and for the same reason: The savings in carrying costs are greater when
rates are higher, or when one must hold for a longer time, or both. In the above
example, if one were to assume there were 6 months to expiration instead of 3, the
fair value of the premium would increase to 4 points from 2 points. Similarly, if the
time were decreased, the fair value would be smaller.
Some investors, primarily institutional investors, use the short-term T-bill rate
rather than the carrying rate in order to determine the futures fair value. The reason
they do that is to determine whether the money they have in cash is better off in T­
bills or in an arbitrage strategy such as this. More will be said about this use of the T­
hill rate later.
Dividends Have an Inverse Correlation to the Premium Value.
An increase in the overall yield of the index will shrink the fair value of the futures
contract. This is because the futures holder does not get the dividends and therefore
the future is not as valuable because of the loss of dividends. Conversely, if dividend
yields fall, then the fair value of the premium increases. This is not the whole story
on dividends, however.
Recall that a few paragraphs ago, it was pointed out that the yield and the
amount of dividends are not exactly the same thing. This is because stocks don't pay
their dividends in a uniform manner. Rather than paying a continuous yield as bonds
do, stocks normally pay their dividends in four lump sums a year. This means that the
yield variable in the simple formula shown above should be replaced by the actual
amount of dividends remaining until expiration. This fact makes the computation of
the fair value of the index a little more difficult. In order to do it accurately, one must
know the dividend amounts and ex-dividend dates of each of the stocks in the index.
Knowing all of this information is a far more formidable task than knowing the yield
of the index, since the yield is published weekly in several places. In fact, the servic­
es of a computer are required in order to compute the actual dividend on the larger
indices, where 100 or more stocks are involved.
As a result, the actual formula changes slightly from the simple formula shown
above:
Actual Formula:
Futures fair value = Index x ( 1 + Time x Rate) - Dividends