Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/be5c860e104692d163bafad332bb657616508e5e855a3bf60f1826fffcf652d2.txt

36 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
Chapter 14: Diagonalizing a Spread 239
In summary, the diagonal bull spread may often be an improvement over the
normal bull spread. The diagonal spread is an improvement when the stock remains
relatively unchanged or falls, up until the near-term written call expires. At that time,
the spread can be converted to a normal bull spread if the stock is at a favorable price.
Of course, if at any time the underlying stock rises above the higher striking price at
an expiration date, the diagonal spread will be profitable.
OWNING A CALL FOR "FREE"
Diagonalization can be used in other spread strategies to accomplish much the same
purposes already described; but in addition, it may also be possible for the spreader
to wind up owning a long call at a substantially reduced cost, possibly even for free.
The easiest w~y to see this would be to consider a diagonal bear spread.
Example: XYZ is at 32 and the near-term April 30 call is selling for 3 points while the
longer-term July 35 call is selling for 1 ½ points. A diagonal bear spread could be
established by selling the April 30 and buying the July 35. This is still a bear spread,
because a call with a lower striking price is being sold while a call at a higher strike
is being purchased. However, since the purchased call has a longer maturity date
than the written call, the spread is diagonalized.
This diagonal bear spread will make money ifXYZ falls in price before the near­
term April call expires. For example, ifXYZ is at 29 at expiration, the written call will
expire worthless and the July 35 will still have some value, perhaps ½. Thus, the prof­
it would be 3 points on the April 30, less a 1-point loss on the July 35, for an overall
profit of 2 points. The risk in the position lies to the upside, just as in a regular bear
spread. If XYZ should advance by a great deal, both options would be at parity and
the spread would have widened to 5 points. Since the initial credit was 1 ½ points, the
loss would be 5 minus 1 ½, or 3½ points in that case. As in all diagonal spreads, the
spread will do slightly better to the downside because the long call will hold some
value, but it will do slightly worse to the upside if the underlying stock advances sub­
stantially.
The reason that a strategist might attempt a diagonal bear spread would not be
for the slight downside advantage that the diagonalizing effect produces. Rather it
would be because he has a chance of owning the July 35 call - the longer-term call -
for a substantially reduced cost. In the example, the cost of the July 35 call was 1 ½
points and the premium received from the sale of the April 30 call was 3 points. If
the spreader can make 1 ½ points from the sale of the April 30 call, he will have com­
pletely covered the cost of his July option. He can then sit back and hope for a rally