Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/af80b917ca925220214e32dd937dd4a3dc3a8116945aee987da0e21eb26640e3.txt

38 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
658 Part V: Index Options and Futures
tracts in order to help ensure that the market cannot be manipulated by someone
forcing the price to move tremendously in one direction or the other. Another rea­
son for having trading limits is ostensibly to allow only a fixed move, approximately
equal to or slightly less than the amount covered by the initial margin requirement,
so that maintenance margin can be collected if need be. However, limits have been
applied to all futures, some of which don't really seem to warrant a limit - U.S.
Treasury bonds, for example. The bond issue is too large to manipulate, and there is
a liquid "cash" bond market to hedge with.
Regardless, limits are a fact of life in futures trading. Each individual commod­
ity has its own limits, and those limits may change depending on how the exchange
views the volatility of that commodity. For example, when gold was trading wildly at
a price of more than $700 per ounce, gold futures had a larger daily trading limit than
they do at more stable levels of $300 to $400 an ounce (the current limit is a $15
move per day). If a commodity reaches its limit repeatedly for two or three days in a
row, the exchange will usually increase the limit to allow for more price movement.
The Chicago Board of Trade automatically increases limits by 50% if a futures con­
tract trades at the limit three days in a row.
Whenever limits exist there is always the possibility that they can totally destroy
the liquidity of a market. The actual commodity underlying the futures contract is
called the "spot" and trades at the "spot price." The spot trades without a limit, of
course. Thus, it is possible that the spot commodity can increase in price tremen­
dously while the futures contract can only advance the daily limit each day. This sce­
nario means that the futures could trade "up or down the limit" for a number of days
in a row. As a consequence, no one would want to sell the futures if they were trad­
ing up the limit, since the spot was much higher. In those cases there is no trading in
the futures - they are merely quoted as bid up the limit and no trades take place. This
is disastrous for short sellers. They may be wiped out without ever naving the chance
to close out their positions. This sometimes happens to orange juice futures when an
unexpected severe freeze hits Florida. Options can help alleviate the illiquidity
caused by limit moves. That topic is covered later in this chapter.
DELIVERY
Futures on physical commodities can be assigned, much like stock options can be
assigned. When a futures contract is assigned, the buyer of the contract is called upon
to receive the full contract. Delivery is at the seller's option, meaning that the owner
of the contract is informed that he must take delivery. Thus, if a corn contract is
assigned, one is forced to receive 5,000 bushels of corn. The old adage about this
being dumped in your yard is untrue. One merely receives a warehouse receipt and