Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/9ff502d7d3fc9252b8c54d60551785bd9823b1bab555272aaf0051b98572e47f.txt

38 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
513
OPTION TrAdINg STrATegIeS
Table 35.6 d summarizes the profi t/loss results for various short put positions for a range of price
assumptions. As can be seen, as puts move more deeply in the money, they begin to more closely
resemble a long futures position. (As previously explained in the case of calls, sellers of deep in-the-
money options should be cognizant of the real possibility of early exercise.) Short positions in deep
out-of-the-money puts will prove profi table for the vast range of prices, but the maximum gain is
small and the theoretical maximum loss is unlimited.
Figure 35.6 d compares each type of short put to a long futures position. The short at-the-money
put position will be the most profi table strategy under stable market conditions and the middle-of-
the-road strategy (relative to the other two types of puts) in declining and rising markets. The short
out-of-the-money put will lose the least in a declining market, but it will also be the least profi table
strategy if prices advance. The short in-the-money put is the type of put that has the greatest potential
and risk and, as mentioned above, there is a strong resemblance between this strategy and an outright
long position in futures.
It should be emphasized that the comparisons in Figure 35.6 d are based upon single-unit positions.
However, as previously explained, these alternative strategies do not represent equivalent position
sizes. Comparisons based on positions weighted equally in terms of some risk measure (e.g., equal
delta values) would yield diff erent empirical conclusions.
FIGURE  35.6c Profi t/loss Profi le: Short Put (In-the-Money)
Price of August gold futures at option expiration ($/oz)
Futures price
at time of
position initiation
Breakeven price
=$1,191.30
Profit/loss at expiration ($)
1,000
10,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
15,000
20,000
0
1,050 1,100 1,150 1,200 1,250 1,300 1,350 1,400
Strike price