Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/7725fbe88259acedb7acc534c67bc3190e433f547e223e41afa51be44fc3f4d1.txt

43 lines
2.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
502
A Complete Guide to the Futures mArket
a short futures position more closely. (Sellers of deep in-the-money calls should be aware that longs
may choose to exercise such options well before expiration. early exercise can occur if the poten-
tial interest income on the premium is greater than the theoretical time value of the option for a
zero interest rate assumption.) Short positions in deep out-of-the-money calls will prove profitable
for the vast range of prices, but the maximum gain is small and the theoretical maximum loss is
unlimited.
Figure 35.4d compares each type of short call to a short futures position. The short at-the-money
call position will be the most profitable strategy under stable market conditions and the middle-of-
the-road strategy (relative to the other two types of calls) in rising and declining markets. The short
out-of-the-money call will lose the least in a rising market, but it will also be the least profitable
strategy if prices decline. The short in-the-money call is the type of call that has the greatest potential
and risk and, as mentioned above, there is a strong resemblance between this strategy and an outright
short position in futures.
It should be emphasized that the comparisons in Figure 35.4d are based upon single-unit positions.
However, as previously explained, these alternative strategies do not represent equivalent position
sizes. Comparisons based on positions weighted equally in terms of some risk measure (e.g., equal
delta values) would yield different empirical conclusions.
tabLe 35.4d profit/Loss Matrix for Short Calls with Different Strike prices
Dollar amount of premium received
$1,050 $1,100 $1,150 $1,200 $1,250 $1,300 $1,350
Call Call Call Call Call Call Call
$15,520 $11,010 $7,010 $3,880 $1,920 $910 $450
position profit/Loss at expiration
Futures price at
expiration ($/oz)
Short Futures
at $1,200
In-the-Money
at-the-
Money Out-of-the Money
$1,050 Call $1,100 Call a $1,150 Call $1,200 Call a $1,250 Call $1,300 Call a $500 Call
1,000 $20,000 $15,520 $11,010 $7,010 $3,880 $1,920 $910 $450
1,050 $15,000 $15,520 $11,010 $7,010 $3,880 $1,920 $910 $450
1,100 $10,000 $10,520 $11,010 $7,010 $3,880 $1,920 $910 $450
1,150 $5,000 $5,520 $6,010 $7,010 $3,880 $1,920 $910 $450
1,200 $0 $520 $1,010 $2,010 $3,880 $1,920 $910 $450
1,250 $5,000 $4,480 $3,990 $2,990 $1,120 $1,920 $910 $450
1,300 $10,000 $9,480 $8,990 $7,990 $6,120 $3,080 $910 $450
1,350 $15,000 $14,480 $13,990 $12,990 $11,120 $8,080 $4,090 $450
1,400 $20,000 $19,480 $18,990 $17,990 $16,120 $13,080 $9,090 $4,550
aThese calls are compared in Figure 35.4d.