Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/4040a5fab0be1f043f8faef46f7735c1aa63405e7f84dd2765387216b29f45ab.txt

36 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
416 Part IV: Additional Considerations
option investment down from the current $30,000 figure to $12,000, or 10% of his
total assets. If one fails to adhere to this readjustment of his funds after profits are
made, he may eventually lose those profits. Since options can lose a great percentage
of their worth in a short time pe1iod, the investor is always running the risk that the
option portion of his investment may be nearly wiped out. If he has kept all his prof­
its in the option portion of his strategy, he is constantly risking nearly all of his accu­
mulated profits, and that is not wise.
One must also adjust his ratio of T-bills to options after losses occur.
Example: In the first year, the strategist loses all of the $10,000 he originally placed
in options. This would leave him with total assets of $90,000 plus interest (possibly
$6,000 of interest might be earned). He could readjust to a 90:10 ratio by selling out
some of the T-bills and using the proceeds to buy options. If one follows this strate­
gy, he will be risking 10% of his funds each year. Thus, a series of loss years could
depreciate the initial assets, although the net losses in one year would be smaller than
10% because of the interest earned on the T-bills. It is recommended that the strate­
gist pursue this method of readjusting his ratios in both up and down markets in
order to constantly provide himself with essentially similar risk/reward opportunities
at all times.
The individual can blend the option selection process and the adjustment of the
T-bill/option ratio to fit his individual portfolio. The larger portfolio can be diversi­
fied into options \vith differing holding periods, and the ratio adjustments can be
made quite frequently, perhaps once a month. The smaller investor should concen­
trate on somewhat longer holding periods for his options, and would adjust the ratio
less often. Some examples might help to illustrate the way in which both the large
and small strategist might operate. It should be noted that this T-bill/option strategy
is quite adaptable to fairly small sums of money, as long as the 10% that is going to
be put into option purchases allows one to be able to participate in a reasonable man­
ner. A tactic for the extremely small investor is also described below.
ANNUALIZED RISK
Before getting into portfolio size, let us describe the concept of annualized risk.
One might want to purchase options with the intent of holding some of them for 30
days, some for 90 days, and some for 180 days. Recall that he does not want his
option purchases to represent more than 10% annual risk at any time. In actual
practice, if one purchases an option that has 90 days of life, but he is planning to
hold the option only 30 days, he will most likely not lose 100% of his investment in