Files
ollama-model-training-5060ti/training_data/curated/text/3a33556dc1f5c1cae9f7b38a94adfb0f201a6a95ffeec7cc282957e3fb93478f.txt

42 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
406 Part Ill: Put Option Strategies
nificant assumption that volatility and interest rates are unchanged). If XYZ trades
higher than llO, the diagonal spread will lose some of its profit; in fact, if XYZ were
to trade at a very high price, the diagonal spread would actually have a loss (see Table
25-4). Whenever the purchased LEAPS call loses its time value premium, the diag­
onal spread will not perform as well.
If the common stock drops in price, the diagonal spread has the greatest risk in
dollar terms but not in percentage terms, because it has the largest initial debit. If
XYZ falls to 80 in three months, the spread will lose about $1,100, just over half the
initial $2,050 debit. Obviously, the short-term spread would have lost 100% of its ini­
tial debit, which is only $500, at that same point in time.
The diagonal spread presents an opportunity to earn more money if the under­
lying common is near the strike of the written option when the written option expires.
However, if the common moves a great deal in either direction, the diagonal spread
is the worst of the three. This means that the diagonal spread strategy is a neutral
strategy: One wants the underlying common to remain near the written strike until
the near-term option expires. This is a true statement even if the diagonal spread is
under the guise of a bullish spread, as in the previous example.
Many traders are fond of buying LEAPS and selling an out-of-the-money near­
term call as a hedge. Be careful about doing this. If the underlying common rises too
fast and/or interest rates fall and/or volatility decreases, this could be a poor strategy.
There is really nothing quite as psychologically damaging as being right about the
stock, but being in the wrong option strategy and therefore losing money. Consider
the above examples. Ostensibly, the spreader was bullish on XYZ; that's why he chose
bull spreads. If XYZ became a wildly bullish stock and rose from 100 to 180 in three
months, the diagonal spreader would have lost money. He couldn't have been happy
- no one would be. This is something to keep in mind when diagonalizing a LEAPS
spread.
The deltas of the options involved in the spread will give one a good clue as to
how it is going to perform. Recall that a short-term, in-the-money option acquires a
rather high delta, especially as expiration draws nigh. However, an in-the-money
LEAPS call will not have an extremely high delta, because of the vast amount of time
remaining. Thus, one is short an option with a high delta and long an option with a
smaller delta. These deltas indicate that one is going to lose money if the underlying
stock rises in price. Consider the following situation:
XYZ Stock, 120:
Call
Long 1 January LEAPS 100 call:
Short 1 April 110 call:
Position Delta
0.70
-0.90