Chapter 38: The Distribution of Stock Prices 187 Lest you think that this example was biased by the fact that it was taken during a strong run in the NASDAQ market, here's another example, conducted with a dif­ ferent set of data- using stock prices between June 1 and July 18, 1999 (also 30 trad­ ing days in length). At that time, there were fewer large moves; about 250 stocks out of 2,500 or so had moves of more than three standard deviations. However, that's still one out of ten - way more than you've been led to expect if you believe in the nor­ mal distribution. The results are shown in Table 38-3. TABLE 38-3. More stock price movements. Total Stocks: 2,447 Dates: 6/1 /99-7 /18/99 Upside Moves: Downside Moves: 3cr 104 54 4cr 28 19 Scr 13 7 >6cr 12 14 Total number of stocks moving >=3cr: 251 ( 10% of the stocks studied) Total 157 94 Finally, one more example was conducted, using the least volatile period that we had in our database - July of 1993. Those results are in Table 38-4. TABLE 38-4. Stock price movements during a nonvolatile period. Total Stocks: 588 Dates: 7 /1 /93-8/17 /93 3cr 4cr Scr >6cr Total Upside Moves: 14 5 1 1 21 Downside Moves: 28 5 3 4 40 Total number of stocks moving >=3cr: 61 ( 10% of the stocks studied) At first glance, it appears that the number of large stock moves diminished dra­ matically during this less volatile period in the market - until you realize that it still represents 10% of the stocks in the study. There were just a lot fewer stocks with list­ ed options in 1993 than there were in 1999, so the database is smaller (it tracks only stocks with listed options). Once again, this means that there is a far greater chance for large standard deviations moves - about one in ten - than the nearly zero percent chance that the lognormal distribution would indicate. VOLATILITY BUYER'S RULE! The point of the previous discussion is that stocks move a lot farther than you might expect. Moreover, when they make these moves, it tends to be with rapidity, gener-