Cltapter 17: Put Buying in Conjunction with Common Stock Ownership TABLE 17-3. Highest Call Strike That Pays for an At-the-Money Put (Assuming 2.5 years to expiration) Volatility Coll Strike 30% 40% 50% 70% 100% of Underlying 30% out of money 35% out of money 40% out of money 50% out of money 70% out of money 279 same price as a three-year call struck at 200! That may seem illogical, but the figures can be checked out with the aid of an option-pricing model. Thus, this company was able to hedge all of its CSCO stock, with no downside risk ( the striking price of the puts was the same as the current stock price) and still had profit potential of over 50% to the upside over the next three years. Thus, one should consider using LEAPS options when he establishes a collar - even ifhe is not an institutional trader - because the striking price of the calls can be quite high in comparison to that of the put' s strike or in comparison to the price of the underlying stock. Table 17-3 shows how far out-of-the-money a written call could be that still covers the cost of buying an at-the-money put. The time to expiration in this table is 2.5 years - the longest term listed option that currently exists as a LEAPS option. USING LOWER STRIKES AS A PARTIAL COVERED WRITE It should also be pointed out that one does not necessarily have to forsake all of the profit potential from his stock. He might buy the puts, as usual, and then sell calls with a somewhat lower strike than needed for a low-cost collar, but the quantity of calls sold would be less than that of stock owned. In that way, there would be unlimĀ­ ited profit potential on some of the shares of the underlying stock. Example: Suppose that the following prices exist: XYZ:61 Apr 55 put: 1 Apr 65 call: 2 Furthermore, suppose that one owns 1000 shares of XYZ. Thus, the purchase of 10 Apr 55 puts at 1 point apiece would protect the downside. In order to cover the cost of those puts ($1000), one need only sell five of the Apr 65 calls at 2 points