Chapter 41: Taxes TABLE 41-3. Tax treatment of trades. Short-term capital items: July 35 call: Net proceeds ($200 - $25) Net cost {expired worthless) Short-term capital gain October 35 call: Net proceeds ($300 - $25) Net cost ($600 + $25) Short-term capital loss 919 $175 0 $175 $275 - 625 ($350) Long-term capital item: 100 shares XYZ: Purchased January 2 of one year and sold at January expiration of the following year. Therefore, held for more than one year, qualifying for long-term treatment. Net sale proceeds of stock {assigned call): January 40 call sale proceeds ($400 - $25) Sold 1 00 XYZ at 40 strike {$4,000 $75) Net cost of stock (January 2 trade): Bought 100 at 32 {$3,200 + $75) Long-term capital gain $375 + 3,925 $4,300 - 3,275 $1,025 This example demonstrates an important tax consequence for the covered call writer: His optimum scenario tax-wise is a rising market, for he may be able to achieve a long-term gain on the underlying stock if he holds it for at least one year, while simultaneously subtracting short-term losses from written calls that were closed out at higher prices. Unfortunately, in a declining market, the opposite result could occur: short-term option gains coupled with the possibility of a long-term loss on the underlying stock. There are ways to avoid long-term stock losses, such as buy­ ing a put ( discussed later in the chapter) or going short against the box before the stock becomes long-term. However, these maneuvers would interrupt the covered writing strategy, which may not be a wise tactic. In summary, then, the covered call writer who finds himself with an in-the­ money call written and expiration date drawing near may have several alternatives open to him. If the stock is not yet held long-term, he might elect to buy back the written call and to write another call whose expiration date is beyond the date required for a long-term holding period on the stock. This is apparently what the hypothetical investor in the preceding example did with his October 35 call. Since