842 Initial situation: OEX: 580 Option June 590 call June 600 call A neutral spread would be: Buy 2 June 600 calls Sell I June 590 call Implied Volatility 15% 14% since the deltas are in the ratio of 2-to-l. Part VI: Measuring and Trading Volatility Delta 0.40 0.20 Now, suppose that OEX rises to 600 at a later date, but well before expiration. This is not a particularly attractive price for this position. Recall that, at expiration, a backspread has its worst result at the striking price of the purchased options. Even prior to expiration, one would not expect to have a profit with the index right at 600. However, the statistical advantage that the strategist had to begin with might be able to help him out. The present situation would probably look like this: Option June 590 call June 600 call Implied Volatility 17% 16% The June 600 call is now the at-the-money call, since OEX has risen to 600. As such, its implied volatility will be 16% ( or whatever the "average" volatility is for OEX at that time - the assumption is made that it is still 16% ). The June 590 call has a slightly higher volatility (17%) because volatility skewing is still present. Thus, the options that are long in this spread have had their implied volatility increase; that is a benefit. Of course, the options that are short had theirs increase as well, but the overall spread should benefit for two reasons: 1. Twice as many options are owned as were sold. 2. The effect of increased volatility is greatest on the at-the-money option; the inĀ­ the-money will be affected to a lesser degree. All index options exhibit this volatility skewing. Volatility skewing exists in other markets as well. The other markets where volatility skewing is prevalent are usually