Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
Chapter 33: Mathematical Considerations for Index Products 643
|
||||
For index futures options, there is no risk when the underlying closes near the
|
||||
strike, since they settle for cash. One is not forced to make a choice as to whether to
|
||||
exercise his calls. (See Chapter 27 on arbitrage for a description of risks at expiration
|
||||
when trading reversals or conversions.)
|
||||
In actual practice, floor traders may attempt to establish conversions in futures
|
||||
options for small increments - perhaps 5 or 10 cents in S&P futures, for example.
|
||||
The arbitrageur should note that futures options do actually create a credit or debit
|
||||
in the account. That is, they are like stock options in that respect, even though the
|
||||
underlying instrument is not. This means that if one is using a deep in-the-money
|
||||
option in the conversion, there will actually be some carrying cost involved.
|
||||
Example: An index future is trading at 179.00 and one is going to price the
|
||||
December 190 conversion, assuming that December expiration is 50 days away.
|
||||
Assume that the current carrying cost of money is 10% annually. Finally, assume that
|
||||
the December 190 call is selling for 1.00, and the December 190 put is selling for
|
||||
11.85. Note that the put has a time value premium of only 85 cents, less than the pre
|
||||
mium of the call. The reason for this is that one would have to pay a carrying cost to
|
||||
do the December 190 conversion.
|
||||
If one established the 190 conversion, he would buy the futures (no credit or
|
||||
debit to the account), buy the put (a debit of 11.85), and sell the call (a credit of 1.00).
|
||||
Thus, the account actually incurs a debit of 10.85 from the options. The carrying cost
|
||||
for 10.85 at 10% for 50 days is 10.85 x 10% x 50/365 = 0.15. This indicates that the
|
||||
converter is willing to pay 15 cents less time premium for the put (or conversely that
|
||||
the reversal trader is willing to sell the put for 15 cents less time premium). Instead
|
||||
of the put trading with a time value premium equal to the call price, the put will trade
|
||||
with a premium of 15 cents less. Thus, the time premium of the put is 85 cents,
|
||||
rather than being equal to the price of the call, 1.00.
|
||||
BOX SPREADS
|
||||
Recall that a "box" consists of a bullish vertical spread involving two striking prices,
|
||||
and a bearish vertical spread using the same two strikes. One spread is constructed
|
||||
with puts and the other with calls. The profitability of the box is the same regardless
|
||||
of the price of the underlying security at expiration.
|
||||
Box arbitrage with equity options involves trying to buy the box for less than the
|
||||
difference in the striking prices, for ~ple, trying to buy a box in which the strikes
|
||||
are 5 points apart for 4. 75. Selling the box for more than 5 points would represent
|
||||
arbitrage as well. In fact, even selling the box at exactly 5 points would produce a
|
||||
profit for the arbitrageur, since he earns interest on the credit from the sale.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user