Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
762 Part VI: Measuring and Trading Volatility
|
||||
benefit if implied volatility merely returns to "normal" levels while you hold the posi
|
||||
tion. Of course, having the underlying increase in price is also important.
|
||||
Conversely, an option seller should be keenly aware of implied volatility when
|
||||
the option is initially sold - perhaps even more so than the buyer of an option. This
|
||||
pertains equally well to naked option writers and to covered option writers. If implied
|
||||
volatility is "too low" when the option writing position is established, then an increase
|
||||
(or worse, an explosion) in implied volatility will be very detrimental to the position,
|
||||
completely overcoming the effects of time decay. Hence, an option writer should not
|
||||
just sell options because he thinks he is collecting time decay each day that passes.
|
||||
That may be true, but an increase in implied volatility can completely domin.ate what
|
||||
little time decay might exist, especially for a longer-term option.
|
||||
In a similar manner, a decrease in implied volatility can be just as important.
|
||||
Thus, if the call buyer purchases options that are "too costly," ones in which implied
|
||||
volatility is "too high," then he could lose money even if the underlying makes a mod
|
||||
est move in his favor.
|
||||
In the next chapters, the topic of just how an option buyer or seller should
|
||||
measure implied volatility to determine what is "too low" or "too high" will be dis
|
||||
cussed. For now, suffice it to grasp the general concept that a change in implied
|
||||
volatility can have substantial effects on an option's price far greater effects than the
|
||||
passage of time can have.
|
||||
In fact, all of this calls into question just exactly what time value premium is.
|
||||
That part of an option's value that is not intrinsic value is really affected much more
|
||||
by volatility than it is by time decay, yet it carries the term "time value premium."
|
||||
TIME VALUE PREMIUM IS A MISNOMER
|
||||
Many (perhaps novice) option traders seem to think of time as the main antagonist to
|
||||
an option buyer. However, when one really thinks about it, he should realize that the
|
||||
portion of an option that is not intrinsic value is really much more related to stock
|
||||
price movement and/or volatility than anything else, at least in the short term. For
|
||||
this reason, it might be beneficial to more closely analyze just what the "excess value"
|
||||
portion of an option represents and why a buyer should not primarily think of it as
|
||||
time value premium.
|
||||
An option's price is composed of two parts: (1) intrinsic value, which is the "real"
|
||||
part of the option's value - the distance by which the option is in-the-money, and (2)
|
||||
"excess value" - often called time value premium. There are actually five factors that
|
||||
affect the "excess value" portion of an option. Eventually, time will dominate them
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user