Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
214 • The Intelligent Option Investor
|
||||
from a portfolio of short puts with the yield I might generate from a cor -
|
||||
porate bond portfolio. With this consideration, and keeping in mind that
|
||||
these investments are unlevered, 2 the name of the game is to generate as
|
||||
high a percentage return as possible over the investing time horizon while
|
||||
minimizing the amount of real downside risk you are accepting.
|
||||
T enor Selection
|
||||
To maximize percentage return, in general, it is better to sell options with
|
||||
relatively short-term expirations (usually tenors of from three to nine
|
||||
months before expiration). This is just the other side of the coin of the
|
||||
rule to buy long-tenor options: the longer the time to expiration, the less
|
||||
time value there is on a per-day basis. The rule to sell shorter-tenor options
|
||||
implies that you will make a higher absolute return by chaining together
|
||||
two back-to-back 6-month short puts than you would by selling a single
|
||||
12-month option at the beginning of the period.
|
||||
During normal market conditions, selling shorter-tenor options is
|
||||
the best tactical choice, but during large market downdrafts, when there
|
||||
is terror in the marketplace and implied volatilities increase enormously
|
||||
for options on all companies, you might be able to make more by sell-
|
||||
ing a longer-tenor option than by chaining together a series of shorter-
|
||||
tenor ones (because, presumably, the implied volatilities of options will
|
||||
drop as the market stabilizes, and this drop means that you will make
|
||||
less money on subsequent put sales). At these times of extreme market
|
||||
stress, there are situations where you can find short-put opportunities
|
||||
on long-tenor options that defy economic logic and should be invested
|
||||
in opportunistically.
|
||||
For example, during the terrible market drops in 2009, I found a
|
||||
company whose slightly ITM put long-term equity anticipation securities
|
||||
(LEAPS) were trading at such a high price that the effective buy price of
|
||||
the stock was less than the amount of cash the firm had on its balance
|
||||
sheet. Obviously, for a firm producing positive cash flows, the stock should
|
||||
not trade at less than the value of cash presently on the balance sheet! I ef-
|
||||
fectively got the chance to buy a firm with $6 of cash on the balance sheet
|
||||
and the near certainty of generating about $2 more over the economic life
|
||||
of the options for $5.50. The opportunity to buy $6–$8 worth of cash for
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user