Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook

This commit is contained in:
2025-12-23 21:17:22 -08:00
commit 619e87aacc
2140 changed files with 2513895 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
for the loss on the 70 call. In this case, the breakeven is $79 (the $4
maximum potential loss plus the strike price of 75).
While its good to understand this at-expiration view of this trade, this
diagram is a bit misleading. What does the trader of this spread want to
have happen? If the trader is bearish, he could find a better way to trade his
view than this, which limits his gains to 1.00—he could buy a put. If the
trader believes the stock will make a volatile move in either direction, the
backspread offers a decidedly limited opportunity to the downside. A
straddle or strangle might be a better choice. And if the trader is bullish, he
would have to be very bullish for this trade to make sense. The underlying
needs to rise above $79 just to break even. If instead he just bought 2 of the
75 calls for 1.10, the maximum risk would be 2.20 instead of 4, the
breakeven would be $77.20 instead of $79, and profits at expiration would
rack up twice as fast above the breakeven, since the trader is net long two
calls instead of one. Why would a trader ever choose to trade a backspread?
EXHIBIT 16.1 Backspread at expiration.
The backspread is a complex spread that can be fully appreciated only
when one has a thorough knowledge of options. Instead of waiting patiently
until expiration, an experienced backspreader is more likely to gamma scalp
intermittent opportunities. This requires trading a large enough position to
make scalping worthwhile. It also requires appropriate margining (either
professional-level margin requirements or retail portfolio margining). For