Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
Chapter 31,: 1be Basics of Volatility Trading 747
|
||||
implied volatility is high. Given that fact, he can then construct positions around a
|
||||
neutral strategy or around his view of the future. The time when the volatility seller
|
||||
must be careful is when the options are expensive and no one seems to know why.
|
||||
That's when insider trading may be present, and that's when the volatility seller
|
||||
should defer from selling options.
|
||||
CHEAP OPTIONS
|
||||
When options are cheap, there are usually far less discernible reasons why they have
|
||||
become cheap. An obvious one may be that the corporate structure of the company
|
||||
has changed; perhaps it is being taken over, or perhaps the company· has acquired
|
||||
another company nearly its size. In either case, it is possible that the combined enti
|
||||
ty's stock will be less volatile than the original company's stock was. As the takeover
|
||||
is in the process of being consummated, the implied volatility of the company's
|
||||
options will drop, giving the false impression that they are cheap.
|
||||
In a similar vein, a company may mature, perhaps issuing more shares of stock,
|
||||
or perhaps building such a.., good earnings stream that the stock is considered less
|
||||
volatile than it formerly was. Some of the Internet companies will be classic cases: In
|
||||
the beginning they were high-flying stocks with plenty of price movement, so the
|
||||
options traded with a relatively high degree of implied volatility. However, as the com
|
||||
pany matures, it buys other Internet companies and then perhaps even merges with a
|
||||
large, established company (America Online and Time-Warner Communications, for
|
||||
example). In these cases, actual (statistical) volatility will diminish as the company
|
||||
matures, and implied volatility will do the same. On the surface, a buyer of volatility
|
||||
may see the reduced volatility as an attractive buying situation, but upon further
|
||||
inspection he may find that it is justified. If the decrease in implied volatility seems
|
||||
justified, a buyer of volatility should ignore it and look for other opportunities.
|
||||
All volatility traders should be suspicious when volatility seems to be extreme -
|
||||
either too expensive or too cheap. The trader should investigate the possibilities as to
|
||||
why volatility is trading at such extreme levels. In some cases, the supply and demand
|
||||
of the public just pushes the options to extreme levels; there is nothing more involved
|
||||
than that. Those are the best volatility trading situations. However, if there is a hint
|
||||
that the volatility has gotten to an extreme reading because of some logical (but per
|
||||
haps nonpublic) reason, then the volatility trader should be suspicious and should
|
||||
probably avoid the trade. Typically this happens with expensive options.
|
||||
Buyers of volatility really have little to fear if they miscalculate and thus buy an
|
||||
option that appears inexpensive but turns out not to be, in reality. The volatility buyer
|
||||
might lose money if he does this, and overpaying for options constantly will lead to
|
||||
ruin, but an occasional mistake will probably not be fatal.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user