Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
Chapter 35: Futures Option Strategies for Futures Spreads 711
|
||||
or out-of-the-money puts instead of selling futures, he could be exposing his spread
|
||||
profits to the ravages of time decay. Do not substitute at- or out-of-the-rrwney options
|
||||
for the futures in intramarket or intennarket spreads. The next example will show
|
||||
why not.
|
||||
Example: A futures spreader notices that a favorable situation exists in wheat. He
|
||||
wants to buy July and sell May. The following prices exist for the futures and options:
|
||||
May futures: 410
|
||||
July futures: 390
|
||||
May 410 put: 20
|
||||
July 390 call: 25
|
||||
This trader decides to buy the May 410 put instead of selling May futures; he
|
||||
also buys the July 390 call instead of buying July futures.
|
||||
Later, the following prices exist:
|
||||
May futures: 400
|
||||
July futures: 400
|
||||
May 410 put: 25
|
||||
July 390 call: 30
|
||||
The futures spread would have made 20 points, since they are now the same
|
||||
price. At least this time, he has made money in the option spread. He has made 5
|
||||
points on each option for a total of 10 points overall - only half the money that could
|
||||
have been made with the futures themselves. Nate that these sample option prices
|
||||
still show a good deal of time value premium remaining. If more time had passed and
|
||||
these options were trading closer to parity, the result of the option spread would be
|
||||
worse.
|
||||
It might be pointed out that the option strategy in the above example would
|
||||
work better if futures prices were volatile and rallied or declined substantially. This
|
||||
is true to a certain extent. If the market had moved a lot, one option would be very
|
||||
deeply in-the-money and the other deeply out-of-the-money. Neither one would
|
||||
have much time value premium, and the trader would therefore have wasted all the
|
||||
money spent for the initial time premium. So, unless the futures moved so far as to
|
||||
outdistance that loss of time value premium, the futures strategy would still outrank
|
||||
the option strategy.
|
||||
However, this last point of volatile futures movement helping an option position
|
||||
is a valid one. It leads to the reason for the only favorable option strategy that is a sub-
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user