Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
||||
Selling the Front, Buying the Back
|
||||
If for a particular stock, the February ATM calls are trading at 50 volatility
|
||||
and the May ATM calls are trading at 35 volatility, a vol-calendar trader
|
||||
would buy the Mays and sell the Februarys. Sounds simple, right? The devil
|
||||
is in the details. We’ll look at an example and then discuss some common
|
||||
pitfalls with vol-trading calendars.
|
||||
George has been studying the implied volatility of a $164.15 stock.
|
||||
George notices that front-month volatility has been higher than that of the
|
||||
other months for a couple of weeks. There is nothing in the news to indicate
|
||||
immediate risk of extraordinary movement occurring in this example.
|
||||
George sees that he can sell the 22-day July 165 calls at a 45 percent IV
|
||||
and buy the 85-day September 165 calls at a 38 percent IV. George would
|
||||
like to buy the calendar spread, because he believes the July ATM volatility
|
||||
will drop down to around 38, where the September is trading. If he puts on
|
||||
this trade, he will establish the following position:
|
||||
What are George’s risks? Because he would be selling the short-term
|
||||
ATM option, negative gamma could be a problem. The greeks for this trade,
|
||||
shown in Exhibit 11.7 , confirm this. The negative gamma means each
|
||||
dollar of stock price movement causes an adverse change of about 0.09 to
|
||||
delta. The spread’s delta becomes shorter when the stock rises and longer
|
||||
when the stock falls. Because the position’s delta is long 0.369 from the
|
||||
start, some price appreciation may be welcomed in the short term. The stock
|
||||
advance will yield profits but at a diminishing rate, as negative gamma
|
||||
reduces the delta.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user