Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
Chapter 38: The Distribution of Stock Prices 797
|
||||
models predict; but it certainly means that the buyer of underpriced options stands
|
||||
to benefit in a couple of ways. Conversely, an option seller must certainly concentrate
|
||||
his efforts where options are expensive, and even then should be acutely aware that
|
||||
he may experience larger-than-expected stock price movements while the option
|
||||
position is in place.
|
||||
So what does this mean for option strategies? On the surface, it means that if
|
||||
one uses the normal (or lognormal) distribution for estimating the probability of a
|
||||
strategy's success, he may get a big move in the stock that he didn't originally view as
|
||||
possible. If one were long straddles, that's great. However, if he is short naked
|
||||
options, then there could be a nasty surprise in store. That's one reason why extreme
|
||||
caution should be used regarding selling naked options on stocks; they can make
|
||||
moves of this sort too often. At least with indices, such moves are far less frequent,
|
||||
although the Dow drop of over 550 points in October 1997 was a move of seven stan
|
||||
dard deviations, and the crash of '87 was about a 16-standard deviation move - which
|
||||
Professor Mark Rubenstein of the University of California at Berkeley says was some
|
||||
thing that should occur about once in ten times the life of our current universe! That's
|
||||
according to lognormal distribution, of course, which we know understates things
|
||||
somewhat, but it's still a big number under any distribution.
|
||||
There are two approaches that one can take, then, regarding option strategies.
|
||||
One is to invent another method for estimating stock price distributions. Suffice it to
|
||||
say that that is not an easy task, or someone would have made it well-known already.
|
||||
There have been many attempts, including some in which a large history of stock
|
||||
price movements is observed and then a distribution is fitted to them. The problem
|
||||
with accounting for these occasional large price moves is that it is perhaps an even
|
||||
more grievous error to overestimate the probabilities of such moves than to underes
|
||||
timate them.
|
||||
The second approach is to continue to use the normal distribution, because it's
|
||||
fast and accessible in a lot of places. Then, either rely on option buying strategies
|
||||
( straddles, for example) where implied volatility appears to be low - knowing that you
|
||||
have a chance at better results than the statistics might indicate - or adjust your cal
|
||||
culations mentally for these large potential movements if you are using option selling
|
||||
strategies.
|
||||
THE PRICING OF OPTIONS
|
||||
The extreme movements of the fat tail distribution should be figured into the pricing
|
||||
of an option, but they really are not, at least not by most models. The Black-Scholes
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user