Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
Chapter 31: Index Spreading 583
|
||||
slightly more volatile than these two larger indices, and also has more technology and
|
||||
less basic industry such as steel and chemicals. The OEX movement definitely has
|
||||
good correlation to the S&P 500. The S&P 500 Index (SPX) currently trades at about
|
||||
twice the "speed" of the OEX Index. This has been true since OEX split 2-for-l in
|
||||
November 1997. A one-point move in SPX is approximately equal to a move of 7.5
|
||||
points in the Dow-Jones Industrial Average, while a one-point move in OEX is
|
||||
approximately equal to 15 Dow points.
|
||||
In general, it is easier to spread the indices by using futures rather than options,
|
||||
although only the S&P 500 Index has liquid futures markets. (There is a mini-Value
|
||||
Line futures market, as well as Dow-Jones futures - both of which are fairly illiq
|
||||
uid - but no futures trade on OEX.) One reason for this is liquidity - the index
|
||||
futures markets have large open interest. Another reason is tightness of markets.
|
||||
Futures markets are normally 5 or 10 cents wide, while option markets are 10 cents
|
||||
wide or more. Moreover, an option position that is a full synthetic requires both a put
|
||||
and a call. Thus, the spread in the option quotes comes into play twice.
|
||||
The Japanese stock market can be spread against the U.S. markets by spread
|
||||
ing a U.S. index against Nikkei futures or futures options, traded on the Chicago
|
||||
Mere, or against JPN options, traded on the AMEX.
|
||||
INTER-INDEX SPREADS USING OPTIONS
|
||||
As mentioned before, it may not be as efficient to try to use options in lieu of the
|
||||
actual futures spreads since the futures are more liquid. However, there are still
|
||||
many applications of the inter-index strategy using options.
|
||||
OEX versus S&P 500. The OEX cash-based index options are the most liquid
|
||||
option contracts. Thus, any inter-index spread involving the OEX and other indices
|
||||
must include the OEX options.
|
||||
The S&P 100 was first introduced in 1982 by the CBOE. It was originally
|
||||
intended to be an S&P 500 look-alike whose characteristics would allow investors
|
||||
who did not want to trade futures ( S&P 500 futures) the opportunity to be able to
|
||||
trade a broad index by offering options on the OEX. Initially, the index was known as
|
||||
the CBOE 100, but later the CBOE and Standard and Poor's Corp. reached an
|
||||
agreement whereby the index would be added to S&P's array of indices. It was then
|
||||
renamed the S&P 100.
|
||||
Initially, the two indices traded at about the same price. The OEX was the more
|
||||
expensive of the two for a while in the early 1980s. As the bull market of the 1980s
|
||||
matured, the S&P 500 ground its way higher, eventually reaching a price nearly 30
|
||||
points higher than OEX. As one can see, there is ample room for movement in the
|
||||
spread between the cash indices.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user