Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
148
|
||||
FIGURE 6-1.
|
||||
Ratio write (2: 1 ).
|
||||
+$1,300
|
||||
C
|
||||
0
|
||||
e ·5.
|
||||
X
|
||||
LU
|
||||
al
|
||||
rn rn
|
||||
.3
|
||||
0
|
||||
-e a.
|
||||
Part II: Call Option Strategies
|
||||
Stock Price at Expiration
|
||||
a 3- or 6-month time period. Consequently, this strategy has a rather high probabili
|
||||
ty of making a limited profit. The profit in this example would, of course, be reduced
|
||||
by commission costs and margin interest charges if the stock is bought on margin.
|
||||
Before discussing the specifics of ratio writing, such as investment required,
|
||||
selection criteria, and follow-up action, it may be beneficial to counter two fairly
|
||||
common objections to this strategy. The first objection, although not heard as fre
|
||||
quently today as when listed options first began trading, is "Why bother to buy 100
|
||||
shares of stock and sell 2 calls? You will be naked one call. Why not just sell one
|
||||
naked call?" The ratio writing strategy and the naked writing strategy have very little
|
||||
in common except that both have upside risk. The profit graph for naked writing
|
||||
(Figure 5-1) bears no resemblance to the roof-shaped profit graph for a ratio write
|
||||
(Figure 6-1). Clearly, the two strategies are quite different in profit potential and in
|
||||
many other respects as well.
|
||||
The second objection to ratio writing for the conservative investor is slightly
|
||||
more valid. The conservative investor may not feel comfortable with a position that
|
||||
has risk if the underlying stock moves up in price. This can be a psychological detri
|
||||
ment to ratio writing: When stock prices are rising and everyone who owns stocks is
|
||||
happy and making profits, the ratio writer is in danger of losing money. However, in
|
||||
a purely strategic sense, one should be willing to assume some upside risk in
|
||||
exchange for larger profits if the underlying stock does not rise heavily in price. The
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user