Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
||||
434 Part IV: Additional Considerations
|
||||
underlying stock makes no difference in the eventual outcome. This is generally a
|
||||
true statement. However, there are some risks, and they are great enough that one
|
||||
can actually lose money in conversions and reversals if he does not take care. The
|
||||
risks are fourfold in reversal arbitrage: An extra dividend is declared, the interest rate
|
||||
falls while the reversal is in place, an early assignment is received, or the stock is
|
||||
exactly at the striking price at expiration. Converters have similar risks: a dividend
|
||||
cut, an increase in the interest rate, early assignment, or the stock closing at the strike
|
||||
at expiration.
|
||||
These risks are first explored from the viewpoint of the reversal trader. If the
|
||||
company declares an extra dividend, it is highly likely that the reversal will become
|
||||
unprofitable. This is so because most extra dividends are rather large - more than the
|
||||
profit of a reversal. There is little the arbitrageur can do to avoid being caught by the
|
||||
declaration of a truly extra dividend. However, some companies have a track record
|
||||
of declaring extras with annual regularity. The arbitrageur should be aware of which
|
||||
companies these are and of the timing of these extra dividends. A clue sometimes
|
||||
exists in the marketplace. If the reversal appears overly profitable when the arbi
|
||||
trageur is first examining it (before he actually establishes it), he should be somewhat
|
||||
skeptical. Perhaps there is a reason why the reversal looks so tempting. An extra div
|
||||
idend that is being factored into the opinion of the marketplace may be the answer.
|
||||
The second risk is that of variation in interest rates while the reversal is in
|
||||
progress. Obviously, rates can change over the life of a reversal, normally 3 to 6
|
||||
months. There are two ways to compensate for this. The simplest way is to leave
|
||||
some room for rates to move. For example, if rates are currently at 12% annually, one
|
||||
might allow for a movement of 2 to 3% in rates, depending on the length of time the
|
||||
reversal is expected to be in place. In order to allow for a 2% move, the arbitrageur
|
||||
would calculate his initial profit based on a rate of 10%, 2% less than the currently
|
||||
prevailing 12%. He would not establish any reversal that did not at least break even
|
||||
with a 10% rate. The rate at which a reversal breaks even is often called the "effec
|
||||
tive rate" - 10% in this case. Obviously, if rates average higher than 10% during the
|
||||
life of the reversal, it will make money. Normally, when one has an entire portfolio of
|
||||
reversals in place, he should know the effective rate of each set of reversals expiring
|
||||
at the same time. Thus, he would have an effective rate for his 2-month reversals, his
|
||||
3-month ones, and so forth.
|
||||
Allowing this room for rates to move does not necessarily mean that there will
|
||||
not be an adverse affect if rates do indeed fall. For example, rates could fall farther
|
||||
than the room allowed. Thus, a further measure is necessary in order to completely
|
||||
protect against a drop in rates: One should invest his credit balances generated by the
|
||||
reversals in interest-bearing paper that expires at approximately the same time the
|
||||
reversals do, and that bears interest at a rate that locks in a profit for the reversal
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user