Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||
Cltapter 17: Put Buying in Conjunction with Common Stock Ownership
|
||||
TABLE 17-3.
|
||||
Highest Call Strike That Pays for an At-the-Money Put
|
||||
(Assuming 2.5 years to expiration)
|
||||
Volatility Coll Strike
|
||||
30%
|
||||
40%
|
||||
50%
|
||||
70%
|
||||
100%
|
||||
of Underlying
|
||||
30% out of money
|
||||
35% out of money
|
||||
40% out of money
|
||||
50% out of money
|
||||
70% out of money
|
||||
279
|
||||
same price as a three-year call struck at 200! That may seem illogical, but the figures
|
||||
can be checked out with the aid of an option-pricing model. Thus, this company was
|
||||
able to hedge all of its CSCO stock, with no downside risk ( the striking price of the
|
||||
puts was the same as the current stock price) and still had profit potential of over 50%
|
||||
to the upside over the next three years.
|
||||
Thus, one should consider using LEAPS options when he establishes a collar -
|
||||
even ifhe is not an institutional trader - because the striking price of the calls can be
|
||||
quite high in comparison to that of the put' s strike or in comparison to the price of
|
||||
the underlying stock. Table 17-3 shows how far out-of-the-money a written call could
|
||||
be that still covers the cost of buying an at-the-money put. The time to expiration in
|
||||
this table is 2.5 years - the longest term listed option that currently exists as a LEAPS
|
||||
option.
|
||||
USING LOWER STRIKES AS A PARTIAL COVERED WRITE
|
||||
It should also be pointed out that one does not necessarily have to forsake all of
|
||||
the profit potential from his stock. He might buy the puts, as usual, and then sell calls
|
||||
with a somewhat lower strike than needed for a low-cost collar, but the quantity of
|
||||
calls sold would be less than that of stock owned. In that way, there would be unlim
|
||||
ited profit potential on some of the shares of the underlying stock.
|
||||
Example: Suppose that the following prices exist:
|
||||
XYZ:61
|
||||
Apr 55 put: 1
|
||||
Apr 65 call: 2
|
||||
Furthermore, suppose that one owns 1000 shares of XYZ. Thus, the purchase
|
||||
of 10 Apr 55 puts at 1 point apiece would protect the downside. In order to cover the
|
||||
cost of those puts ($1000), one need only sell five of the Apr 65 calls at 2 points
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user