Add training workflow, datasets, and runbook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
|
||||
398 Part Ill: Put Option Strategies
|
||||
The collateral requirement for the naked put write is the same as that for any
|
||||
naked equity option: 20% of the stock price, plus the option price, less any out-of
|
||||
the-money amount, with an absolute minimum requirement of 15% of the stock
|
||||
price.
|
||||
Collateral Requirement - Naked Put
|
||||
20% of stock price (.20 x 500 x $50)
|
||||
Plus option premium
|
||||
Less out-of-the-money amount
|
||||
Total collateral requirement
|
||||
$5,000
|
||||
1,750
|
||||
0
|
||||
$6,750
|
||||
Note that the actual premium received by the naked put seller is $1,750 less com
|
||||
missions of $100, for example, or $1,650. This net premium could be used to reduce
|
||||
the total collateral requirement.
|
||||
Now one can compare the profitability of the two investments:
|
||||
Return If Stock Over 50 at Expiration
|
||||
Stock sale {500 @ 50)
|
||||
Less stock commission
|
||||
Plus dividends earned until expiration
|
||||
Less net investment
|
||||
Net profit if exercised
|
||||
Net put premium received
|
||||
Dividends received
|
||||
Net profit
|
||||
Covered Write
|
||||
$25,000
|
||||
300
|
||||
+ 1,000
|
||||
- 21,150
|
||||
$ 4,55_0
|
||||
Naked Put Sole
|
||||
$1,650
|
||||
0
|
||||
$1,650
|
||||
Now the returns can be compared, if XYZ is over 50 at expiration of the LEAPS:
|
||||
Return if XYZ over 50
|
||||
(net profit/net investment)
|
||||
Naked put sale: 24.4%
|
||||
Covered write: 21 .5%
|
||||
The naked put write has a better rate of return, even before the following fact
|
||||
is considered. The strategist who is using the naked put write does not have to spend
|
||||
the $6,750 collateral requirement in the form of cash. That money can be kept in a
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user